Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Orion\]\s+Orion\s+Synthesizer\s+speed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Orion\]\s+Orion\s+Synthesizer\s+speed\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: [Orion] Orion Synthesizer speed (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:43:29 -1000; Comment made: I believe that this is "on purpose". As I think I understand, from prior posts on this issue, in exchange for a slower synthesizer, we are given very much lower "close in" phase noise w; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00362.html (8,225 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Re: [Orion] Orion Synthesizer speed (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:47:44 +0000; I guess you guys missed my post on this at the end of December. I spoke to Ten Tec about the jerky synthesiser response and they confirmed it to be nothing to do with slow locking of the synthesiser,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00373.html (10,405 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]