Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Ten\-Tec516\]\s+$unknown$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Ten\-Tec516\]\s+$unknown$\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec516] (unknown) (score: 1): Author: tranda@cox.net (Tim Randa); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:49:48 -0600; Well Scott, contrary to what you might think of me I am a fan of Ten Tec products and have owned at one time or another most of what TT has produced through the years. I also have been subscribed to; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00085.html (10,963 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec516] (unknown) (score: 1): Author: sales@tentec.com (Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales); Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:47:54 -0500; Tim: Think about this for a moment - when I read a message, not addressed to us, regarding a problem with a particular piece of our equipment - what is the logical course of action to take? There is; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00095.html (19,805 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec516] (unknown) (score: 1): Author: tranda@cox.net (Tim Randa); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 16:57:39 -0600; Glad you're still smiling Scott...instead of picking apart your response ( a good one for sure) at the parts I would question, I believe I'll let the thread die. If you feel the need to continue, ema; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00097.html (22,922 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec516] (unknown) (score: 1): Author: Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:59:24 -0500; Having met Scott, and most of the senior staff and management of the company this fall, I can say for sure that this is an honest, straighforward, and very talented group of people. I was impressed,; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00098.html (21,584 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec516] (unknown) (score: 1): Author: jmalloy@stny.rr.com (Joe Malloy); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:02:30 -0500; You know, when are people going to stop using this excuse for someone responding to what is perceived as a critique? It doesn't take that long to answer an email on a reflector (unless you're typing; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00100.html (8,846 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec516] (unknown) (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 20:29:25 -0500; products. respond Ten-Tec, like most companies, has a customer service and technical support process in place for addressing such issues. If you have a question that cannot be easily answered by som; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00102.html (8,969 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec516] (unknown) (score: 1): Author: Kfivebgb@aol.com (Kfivebgb@aol.com); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 21:26:45 EST; Hey Scott: My hat is off to you for going the extra mile in the usual Ten-Tec way of trying to communicate with this poor soul. Save your breath my friend; you have much more important things on whic; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00105.html (7,911 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]