Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\[WL\-USERS\]\s+CW\/PTT\/FSK\s+Interface\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\[WL\-USERS\]\s+CW\/PTT\/FSK\s+Interface\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: [WL-USERS] CW/PTT/FSK Interface (score: 1): Author: Rosenberg.Eric@orbcomm.com (Rosenberg.Eric@orbcomm.com); Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:32:41 -0500; Dick -- your interface shows the CW and PTT as being the same interface (i.e., the same pins) from the serial port. Using the parallel port, I had separate outputs for CW and PTT. To assert PTT on th; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-03/msg00339.html (10,072 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]