Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+ARRL\s+Rcvr\s+3rd\s+and\s+2nd\s+IPs\s+Test\s+Methods\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+ARRL\s+Rcvr\s+3rd\s+and\s+2nd\s+IPs\s+Test\s+Methods\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue Mar 4 20:15:06 2003; Aloha to all following this topic, Ed Hare has written a very detailed and well presented reply to my posts and concerns, thank you Ed. And I accept your criticism of my "low blow"; was not intended; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00134.html (10,429 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed Mar 5 17:50:05 2003; HI again Ed, And thanks for your note, in which you wrote, partly: subscription Ed, I hope he does not take too long; a couple of the folks out here had trouble being accepted! One at last got subscr; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00187.html (19,886 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed Mar 5 18:34:12 2003; Hi guys, I apologize for the format this came in. I am going to redo the piece and resend. Not sure how, but would also like to change this font!! Am sure that is from where the format problem came a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00193.html (8,014 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed Mar 5 19:10:24 2003; Ok, folks, here is a proper format, I hope, with easily read font....and spell checked! My continuing note exchange with Ed Hare, ARRL Lab Supervisor. HI again Ed, And thanks for your note, in which; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00199.html (19,614 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed Mar 5 19:24:27 2003; And, Ed also asked that his second reply to me be posted to the reflector. That is the post to which I most recently responded which contains much of his remarks, but with a lot of my stuff tossed in; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00201.html (14,889 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed Mar 5 20:10:23 2003; Now here again, Ed has responded to my last post. He has also requested that I repost to the reflector, so here goes (this one came here about only 10 minutes ago): " Actually, by "Collins" standard,; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00206.html (20,955 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman); Date: Wed Mar 5 23:29:41 2003; I won't speak to the technical points under discussion here, because I am not qualified to do so. However - I will say that this discussion is some of the best stuff I have ever seen posted. Informat; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00213.html (24,253 bytes)
8. [TenTec] RE: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: w1rfi@arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Thu Mar 6 02:42:23 2003; Hi, Jim, The article in question is available for download at: http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/pdf/020708qex046.pdf I suggest that people read it, especially my sidebar, before reading this post. The me; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00219.html (29,247 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: CAlderma@ora.fda.gov (Alderman, Chester); Date: Thu Mar 6 06:06:47 2003; I certainly agree. And I can see that I made a BIG mistake in one of my previous post by saying something unfounded about the engineers at the ARRL. Based on these discussions, I was way off base abo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00223.html (25,045 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Thu Mar 6 21:27:39 2003; I agree. Yes, it is some of the best technical dialog that I've seen and read in quite some time. That's what the reflector is all about. Thanks guys. 73 Bob, K4TAX the dynamic texts, noise above bee; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00269.html (26,821 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]