- 1. [TenTec] Re: How's the new Vibroplex? (score: 1)
- Author: ki6pr@elite.net (Mike Siegel)
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 08:50:40 -0700
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0004_01BEB18B.FCACB4E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I dunno...it seems to m
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00089.html (10,095 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] Re: How's the new Vibroplex? (score: 1)
- Author: k4wj@att.net (John/K4WJ)
- Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 13:33:43 -0400
- Mike et al, When I was in the navy, 1962-1965, we had to have a "speed Key" license in order to use a bug on a Navy CW circuit. I've got two speed key licenses around here somewhere. 73..de John/K4WJ
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00093.html (8,412 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] Re: How's the new Vibroplex? (score: 1)
- Author: dacalvin@us.ibm.com (dacalvin@us.ibm.com)
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 12:21:58 -0500
- Speaking of bugs and paddles, after trying a "WBL" key a couple years ago, and exchanging note with Scott Robbins yesterday on the same topic, I called and ordered one of their new V22 models. The V2
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00104.html (7,678 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu