Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Pegasus\s+upper\s+band\s+rec\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Pegasus\s+upper\s+band\s+rec\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: Pegasus upper band rec (score: 1): Author: kayser@sympatico.ca (Larry Kayser); Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 11:36:09 -0400; Greetings: I had a total of three Pegasus units here, all performed excellently up to 28 mHz, the same sensitivity and signal resolving ability as the Kenwood TS-570, ICOM 756 etc. I found that the P; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-08/msg00221.html (7,110 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: Pegasus upper band rec (score: 1): Author: jcox" <jcox@digitalexp.com (jcox); Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 11:16:10 -0500; I have compared the Pegasus I have here to a Yaesu FT-920 and see very little difference on 28 Mhz. A small amount but signals will have to be just above the noise level to see any noticeable differe; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-08/msg00222.html (8,506 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]