Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+TenTec\s+Amateur\s+Radio\s+Digest\s+V4\s+\#145\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+TenTec\s+Amateur\s+Radio\s+Digest\s+V4\s+\#145\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: TenTec Amateur Radio Digest V4 #145 (score: 1): Author: WB6TMY@arrl.net (W B Reese); Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 07:57:57 -0700; Dear Mark & the Group, Let me share my ideas with you. 1) Use of an acoustically resonant speaker is always a good idea. I recommend the SkyTek that I have - it's very nice & you could pick up a used; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00161.html (10,237 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: TenTec Amateur Radio Digest V4 #145 (score: 1): Author: cshyde@yahoo.DOT.com (Carl Hyde); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 07:58:57 -0700 (PDT); The drifting Mark is seeing in Digipan is due more to the software and the computers Real Time Clock that to the Omni V's drift. Remember PC Processors don't do floating point math very well. TT sets; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00182.html (8,199 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Re: TenTec Amateur Radio Digest V4 #145 (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 15:28:55 -0000; Why do you say that PC processors don't do floating point math very well ? Processors the no -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requ; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00183.html (9,104 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Re: TenTec Amateur Radio Digest V4 #145 (score: 1): Author: rich@w3zj.com (Richard B Drake); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 13:05:46 -0400; Even the worlds largest super computers can not to floating point arithmetic 100% accurately. This is because it is physically impossible to represent fractional values 100% accurately in binary. The; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00188.html (9,779 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Re: TenTec Amateur Radio Digest V4 #145 (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 18:18:04 -0000; Carls original comment stated that PC processors do not do floating point math very well...implying that there are processors that do it better....thus my question. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesti; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00190.html (10,976 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Re: TenTec Amateur Radio Digest V4 #145 (score: 1): Author: SEWATKINS@dgs.state.va.us (Sherrill WATKINS); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 14:41:41 -0400; Rich: What you are saying is extremely interesting. As a follow on question and as an example; irrational transcendental numbers, like pi and e, cannot be described 100% accurately in our standard ba; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00191.html (10,842 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Re: TenTec Amateur Radio Digest V4 #145 (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 20:17:16 -0000; Don't have to go to 'exotic' things like PI and e, simple things like 1/3 do not have an exact representation as a decimal fraction (0.33333333...333333....33333). Similarly some somple fractions (do; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00196.html (12,330 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]