Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+TenTec\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+14\,\s+Issue\s+68\s+\-\s+Sensitivity\s+Issues\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1)
Author: Allan Henry Kaplan <w1ael@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:45:55 -0500
Yuri, K3BU/C6AYB (great mnemonic for that C6 call, Yuri!) wrote, Does it mean that you can only win with Orion? How about congratulations to me placing on the top of NA Low Power category, using, get
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00765.html (9,437 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:58:59 EST
But take that receiver to the ocean front, put directional antennas on it, use specialized receiving antennas and you will find that you NEED gain on low bands. Or beaming with good directional anten
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00790.html (10,195 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1)
Author: "Reed O. Krenn" <reed_ww3a@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:24:47 -0500
As opposed to *what*, the "Yuri knows better" syndrome? Reed / WW3A _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00792.html (8,339 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:37:34 EST
I am getting really tired of this atmosphere here. I try to address the subject, provide explanation and suggestions for improvement. As a response I get "imaginary reality" and the above crap. You w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00794.html (8,569 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:35:28 -0500
K3BU@aol.com wrote: Sayonara! Hooray! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00795.html (8,622 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1)
Author: "Reed O. Krenn" <reed_ww3a@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:56:26 -0500
Well, at least this thread was aptly titled: 'Sensitivity Issues'. Too bad they had little to do with the equipment................. Reed / WW3A Most Humble Pledge to the Ten Tec Worshippers Cult ___
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00797.html (9,861 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:23:37 -0500
WW3A.... I think the below just solidly proves your point about K3BU, the expert contester. As long as you buy every thing he proposes, it's OK, but dare you defend your own point of view and your a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00798.html (10,212 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:32:29 -0500
The test is both valid and vital in any environment. What it says about gain is of very little importance. What matters is: internal RX noise vs. external noise. And many of us are really interested
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00813.html (9,253 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu