Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Weight\s+vs\s+Ratio\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Weight\s+vs\s+Ratio\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: Weight vs Ratio (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 16:37:54 -0600; Right own, bro, Referring to weight as dot:dash ratio has been a pet peeve of mine for many years. And not just with internal keyers, either. I'm not even convinced that any of them do really adjust; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00260.html (9,263 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: Weight vs Ratio (score: 1): Author: n5ul@wtaccess.com (Charles W. Shaw); Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 00:04:36 +0000; 1. I think I am who is being referred to--I didn't keep a copy of what I wrote to the individual. 2. The Omni VI book calls it "weight" and mentions dot to dash ratio. I think their writer was mista; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00262.html (7,525 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]