Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Receive\s+17m\s+on\s+Omni\s+\,Tritons\,\s+etc\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Receive\s+17m\s+on\s+Omni\s+\,Tritons\,\s+etc\.\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Receive 17m on Omni ,Tritons, etc. (score: 1): Author: "duane eaton" <mllybrn@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:31:13 -0600; I receive 17m on my Omni D ser.B Thusly. Set band to 20m. Use SB-R, Tune from 14414 to 14434. Tune resonator near 21m until noise increases and tune for signals. I estimate the mixer is using the 5th; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00352.html (7,172 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Receive 17m on Omni ,Tritons, etc. (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:34:41 -0700; Interesting tip. In the Omni series C (TT 546 Series C) I not that design was rather cobbled together to add the WARC bands. They had decided on low side LO so they used that for 17m too. So 4MHz cry; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00371.html (9,820 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Receive 17m on Omni ,Tritons, etc. (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:58:08 -0600; That's how 17m is done in the Corsair II with the annoyance that the natural sideband is lower, contrary to common usage. 72, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailin; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00372.html (10,159 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Receive 17m on Omni ,Tritons, etc. (score: 1): Author: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>; Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 12:46:24 -0700; Of course. The mixing will invert the sideband even though the tuning direction isn't changed. Better than lots of RF in the IF strip. At least they wised up on the next design. Ah, the perils of put; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00373.html (8,093 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Receive 17m on Omni ,Tritons, etc. (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 18:26:22 -0600; The 5 MHz VFO and 9 MHz IF was chosen long ago in the late 40s or early 50s for phasing rigs. The 5.3-7 MHz command set tuned down and using it for a VFO worked well because it was very stable. With; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00378.html (10,109 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]