Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SDR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SDR\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: john.brewer@us.schneider-electric.com; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:57:27 -0500; Gee, when rigs are all digital, there's error checking to ensure accurate reception and analog signal extraction, . there'll be no more struggling for a contact, no more fading, broken callsigns or Q; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00606.html (7,020 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:10:41 -0800 (PST); SDR and digital modes are not synonymous, SDR simply makes the implementing of digital modes and different analog mode types easier to implement in the radio, assuming of course that the SDR is desig; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00608.html (8,563 bytes)
3. [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "skip" <k3cc@fast.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:15:27 -0500; The Orion is a good start if they ever make it work is another thing. It's a sad state of affairs when you can't get a mic to work. I have a SDR Flex-Radio non of the Orion Problems and about $2000 c; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00839.html (7,097 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:52:58 -0500; But the Flex doesn't have QSK or at least that's what they told me. Maybe that will come later? N4LQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://l; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00842.html (7,618 bytes)
5. RE: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "Eric SENSI" <eric.sensi@skynet.be>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 19:50:24 +0100; Hello all... Finally I am a happy man for 2 days ! :-) It was a hard decision to sell my Orion, but had no choice ! So now, I owned : - A JA radio with poor numbers - A non-SDR radio - A radio with n; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00843.html (9,131 bytes)
6. RE: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:30:25 -0600; You won't get flamed (well, at least not by me). We all make choices for many reasons. I don't subscribe to the "my radio is my religion" train of thought. Never owned a Yaesu, and have no desire to; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00848.html (8,735 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:37:12 -0000; Eric Aren't you happy that with radios it isn't a case of "one size fits all"? I am very pleased you have found the right equipment for your needs. I have been lucky to do that too. I sold my FT1000M; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00854.html (11,390 bytes)
8. RE: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:29:05 -0800; Eric, you did indeed have some bad problems. A lot of the people here went out of their way to try to help you. Your dealer did a lot of back peddling to try to help you. He even helped you get the n; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00858.html (11,236 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:33:40 -0500; My sentiments exactly! It's now time for you to go post on the Yaesu reflector. -- Original Message -- From: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> To: <eric.sensi@skynet.be>; <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00860.html (12,429 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: Michael Blake <k9jri@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:48:13 -0800 (PST); I agree with both of you. What a lack of class. 73 - Mike - K9JRI Eric, you did indeed have some bad problems. A lot of the people here went out of their way to try to help you. Your dealer did a lot; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00861.html (8,746 bytes)
11. RE: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "Eric SENSI" <eric.sensi@skynet.be>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:49:22 +0100; Sorry Dear Rick, I did not offended anyone here, and everytime I received some advices it was a pleasure to try this and that ! At least, I never ever criticize the job done by everyone here to help; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00862.html (12,769 bytes)
12. RE: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "Eric SENSI" <eric.sensi@skynet.be>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:54:30 +0100; As I said, I was ready to get flamed... It is not a lack of class I think. I will not post on the Yaesu reflector, I have nothing to do there... And It's my absolute right to stay here to read and po; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00863.html (9,572 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:13:43 -0600; My sentiments exactly! It's now time for you to go post on the Yaesu reflector. SMILE ... Really, who died and left you to decide what everyone can/can't do on here? Can't take the heat? I've owned T; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00865.html (9,288 bytes)
14. RE: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "RM" <royalct@inr.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:31:04 -0500; Sounds like a bunch of kids doing a petty argument. Let's get back to tech/operation talk. Ron _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00867.html (8,077 bytes)
15. RE: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 03:29:05 +0000; You can sure tell when the bands stink by the trash on the internet. kc4atu From: "RM" <royalct@inr.net> Reply-To: tentec@contesting.com To: <tentec@contesting.com> Subject: RE: [TenTec] SDR Date: Th; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00886.html (9,239 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:51:12 -0600; Eric: I am really glad that you finally purchased a radio that you like. I hope that you get many good QSOs out of it. And, I agree with you, that you have every right to post on this board. I think; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00889.html (11,671 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:41:49 -0500; I don't see the problem. He had a rig that was NG, and now he has one he is happy with. I say, "great"...Now he can get on the air and have fun. Seems A.O.K. to me!! ...Dave and a at my since (183 It; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00951.html (13,690 bytes)
18. [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: SPENCER <w1gak@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 02:34:45 -0600; I remember a few years ago when the invention of transistors and the integrated circuit was the end of amateur radio. My alpha amplifier has 2 tubes. Spencer W1GAK (great American kilowatt) _________; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00136.html (6,551 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:39:45 +0200; I thought it was German-Austrian Kilowatt! (hi) Well I began SWL in 1959 and was licensed in 1962. I remember well when the transistor came in. But I don't recall ever hearing anyone say that the tra; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00137.html (8,254 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1): Author: Greg S via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 07:01:44 -0700; As a side note, those SBE rigs had Collins mechanical filters in them, which are no longer being produced. When you see one at a swap for $15, you might wanna peek inside it before brushing it off. J; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00143.html (6,897 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]