- 1. [TenTec] SDR Vs. TT, et al (score: 1)
- Author: Greg S via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 14:31:52 +0000 (UTC)
- In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not. ~anon. I am a simple guy, and I think that where the "rubber meets the road" is what matters. I postulate the following: Make a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00118.html (10,076 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] SDR Vs. TT, et al (score: 1)
- Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 09:48:15 -0500
- Sorry Greg, the Flex and ANAN are contest ready and fully capable of a top 10 finish. Why so few top contesters use them is all about ergonomics, not performance. And hey, NOBODY goes over 48wpm in a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00120.html (11,271 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] SDR Vs. TT, et al (score: 1)
- Author: Greg S via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:06:01 +0000 (UTC)
- Good on all, Barry- can you tell I am NOT a contester? ;-) ......so maybe I have not understood the discussion. Is the discussion only about receive recovery in QSK? What do you all fundamentally dis
- /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00122.html (13,067 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu