Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Some\s+NR\s+Performance\s+Measurements\s+on\s+the\s+O\-II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Some\s+NR\s+Performance\s+Measurements\s+on\s+the\s+O\-II\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Some NR Performance Measurements on the O-II (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 01:15:27 -0600; Very noisy band conditions here tonight, with storm noise in the area -- lousy band conditions overall, and propogation seemed to be off, with many of the usual big gun signals not up to par. I set o; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00583.html (8,542 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Some NR Performance Measurements on the O-II (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 00:27:41 -0700; I think you nailed in Grant. RF gain set to 100. I agree that NR works very well at this setting but as you reduce your RF gain, the NR begins to distort. So, there appears to be a direct relationshi; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00584.html (9,303 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Some NR Performance Measurements on the O-II (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 08:33:21 EST; Grant, Douglas.... Very nice work! Now today I am going to try out that scenario on 20 as well (lately seems like the band of choice for DX) RF gain full throttle.... Airspeed 140, flaps 40, gear dow; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00587.html (7,425 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Some NR Performance Measurements on the O-II (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:14:59 -0600; I did redo the SNR tests on 20 today. The result there with a much better band noise profile to work with was on the order of 20dB improvement. I ran most of the tests at 1Khz BW. I'm not trying to; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00599.html (8,163 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]