Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Speech\s+to\s+Text\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Speech\s+to\s+Text\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: John Chance-Read <johnchanceread@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:48:44 +0000 (GMT); Being deaf, I am trying to locate a 'Speech to Text' software package. All my attempts, despite careful choice of route, always lands up with a 'Text to Speech'. I use CW Skimmer to display the morse; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00140.html (6,816 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: geoffrey mendelson <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:01:15 +0200; http://www.nuance.com/ Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, N3OWJ/4X1GM Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to misquote it. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing lis; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00141.html (8,033 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:05:57 +0000 (UTC); John, You may want to google 'speech to text' I came up with the following URL http://www.nuance.com/talk/ Good luck with the project. Let us know when you have it working or keep us posted as you pr; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00142.html (8,122 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:45:28 -0500; I have every commercially available speech recognition program published since 1992, and have been a beta tester for every manufacturer (except Phillips who pulled out of the North Am market ten year; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00144.html (10,485 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:18:43 -0600; Geoff's suggestion may be the best out there right now. Dragon has gone through a number of variations and it is much better at translating. The only major problem is that it is designed to translate; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00145.html (9,606 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: mike bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:33:29 -0500; I tried to use Macspeech Dictate (powered by dragon) and have had lack luster results. perhaps my speech is less than perfect, but I can't get it to do my call sign correctly. At $300 bucks, micropho; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00146.html (11,331 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: "Bruce McLaughlin" <bmclaugh@bex.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:21:20 -0500; I can second the recommendation for Dragon naturally speaking. I have both the program for a PC and another version for the Macintosh. Both of them work pretty much the same as far as recognition acc; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00150.html (10,591 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: kf6e@mail.com; Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:01:57 -0500; This just occurred to me: How would a deaf person tune in a SSB signal? You can see a CW signal on the spectrum of CW Sweeper and other CW reading programs; likewise for PSK and RTTY. But I can't ima; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00151.html (8,569 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: Steven Kline <skline4@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:36:07 -0600; I'm thinking, tune until you see text print which is readable? steve - W5JK _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00153.html (9,148 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:00:33 -0600; If you use a panadapter, its fairly easy to see when you have the signal tuned in properly. I use a FLEX-1500 in panadapter mode as the sub-rx (N4PY mod) for my TenTec OMNI-VII and slave it with DXLa; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00154.html (10,713 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:02:31 -0600; Interesting point. I see newbies tuning just to the point they can copy and the audio sounds to be 200 or 300 Hz off frequency which doesn't improve copy and is far enough off tune with a transceiver; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00155.html (10,720 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:21:15 -0600; Recently I experimented with the TX equalization on my OMNI-VII by attenuating the lows and increasing the highs. What I found was, it didn't help, at least in contests it didn't, even with the amp o; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00157.html (11,534 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:28:01 -0500 (EST); I seem to get the best reports with my Orion II's TX EQ flat, bass roll-off at 150 Hz, and TX bandwidth at 2850 Hz. The mic is a T-T 707. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 12/6/2010 7:22:43 P.M. GMT Sta; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00158.html (11,268 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:03:08 -0600; Usually you get more punch as seen on the wattmeter and the receiver S-meter with strong lows. Sometimes you get better copy on a weak signal with a little enhancement of the highs for better articul; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00161.html (10,378 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:59:18 -0500; I agree with everything Bruce says, and I used it in my practice since 1992 - and his experience mirrors mine exactly as he states. I am worried, however, that in my haste, I may have missed John's e; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00190.html (14,504 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:43:53 -0500; My voice is bass enriched... I get my best audio reports on my Omni VII with EQ flat, and using the 200 Hz bass roll off. I don't mess with the receive EQ. Microphones are various headsets, Shure SM-; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00196.html (8,544 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1): Author: John Chance-Read <johnchanceread@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:38:21 +0000 (GMT); My thanks to all of you for responding to my request for Speech to Text. James Richards K8JHR on his second take, expertly summed up my problems - that all such programmes tend to meet the 'voice com; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00205.html (15,997 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]