Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Splitting\s+up\s+the\s+Ten\*Tec\s+reflector\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Splitting\s+up\s+the\s+Ten\*Tec\s+reflector\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Splitting up the Ten*Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: w8kc@comcast.net (Paul Valko); Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:18:01 -0400; -- Original Message -- Ok... I for one am going on record to say I will NOT join another Ten-Tec reflector. I have at least three reasons for taking this stand. 1 - The Ten*Tec community is simply to; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00358.html (9,221 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Splitting up the Ten*Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: w4foa@voy.net (Tony Martin); Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:43:38 -0400; Paul, I'm sure no one will lose any sleep over this, but I too have NO intention to join a "splinter" TT group. Personally I see no merit to it. If this TT reflector was saturated with traffic, it mi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00359.html (10,269 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Splitting up the Ten*Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: johnmb@nc.rr.com (john); Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:13:20 -0400; Amen! Specialization is for insects! John wb5oau To: <tentec@contesting.com> -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). To: <tentec@contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00361.html (10,710 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Splitting up the Ten*Tec reflector (score: 1): Author: w8keb@1st.net (Ken & Linda Burrough); Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 14:23:44 -0400; Hi All I agree with Paul/w8kc I will not be going to any other reflector. I hope I can call Steve N4LQ a friend, never meet him, but I have noticed he is right about everything he posts and Steve did; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00418.html (8,909 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]