Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Starter\s+Rigs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Starter\s+Rigs\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Starter Rigs (score: 1): Author: "Dick, WN3R" <wn3r@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 16:32:00 -0400; I've helped a good number of "new" hams, young and old. I have found the best starter rigs are those in the $300-$400 range with a general coverage receiver. Rigs in this range, if in good physical a; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-05/msg00120.html (6,988 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Starter Rigs (score: 1): Author: ki3b@aim.com; Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 17:13:27 -0400 (EDT); I've helped a good number of "new" hams, young and old. I have found the best starter rigs are those in the $300-$400 range with a general coverage receiver. Rigs in this range, if in good physical a; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-05/msg00139.html (8,132 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Starter Rigs (score: 1): Author: ki3b@aim.com; Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 17:18:53 -0400 (EDT); Let's try this again..... You have to be careful of the 'Kenwoods, Yaesu's and Icoms" from that era. As long as they work, they're great, but there's been a number of announcements from the big 3 tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-05/msg00140.html (9,090 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Starter Rigs (score: 1): Author: Martin Ewing <martin.s.ewing@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 13:17:20 -0400; I still hang on to my Kenwood TS-520S, partly because there's practically nothing in it that couldn't be replaced today. No custom ICs -- no ICs at all. 73 Martin AA6E -- Dr. Martin S. Ewing, AA6E Me; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-05/msg00141.html (10,705 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Starter Rigs (score: 1): Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>; Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 12:49:05 -0500; You nailed that one - here's a FS post from eHam not too long ago: leftovers and I no longer need them. $75 each or all 8 for $550< Unless I'm way underestimating the value of the '301, the cost of r; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-05/msg00142.html (10,557 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]