Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TRX\s+power\s+drain\s+on\s+Argo\s+516\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TRX\s+power\s+drain\s+on\s+Argo\s+516\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] TRX power drain on Argo 516 (score: 1): Author: tlogan7@cox.net (tlogan7@cox.net); Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 23:27:09 -0700; Hi folks - I want to make sure I am understanding this correctly. TenTec's specs show that the Argo 516 draws 6A on cw TRX at 20 watt. Elecraft's K2 is (albeit about 14watts) is almost half of that f; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00064.html (7,335 bytes)
2. [TenTec] TRX power drain on Argo 516 (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com); Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 07:23:27 -0500; Perhaps the microprocessor in the DSP is the culprit for the high power consumption. I never considered the Argo V, K2 or 2020 to be true QRP rigs. To me, a QRP rig is one that is simple to build, ve; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00065.html (8,795 bytes)
3. [TenTec] TRX power drain on Argo 516 (score: 1): Author: ascanand@harris.com (Scanandoah, Alan); Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 08:35:33 -0500; Fantasy rig idea: Something akin to the Argonaut 515, covering all bands from 160-10. All-analog design, but using current manufacturing technology. It would be small and diet-conscious. Al, K2ZN Per; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00069.html (7,802 bytes)
4. [TenTec] TRX power drain on Argo 516 (score: 1): Author: n8coo@juno.com (n8coo@juno.com); Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 04:37:03 +0000; Maybe this has already been answered by someone, but it was explained to me (as best as I can recall) that the Argonaut V is NOT being marketed or represented as a low-power consumption rig. It takes; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00107.html (8,909 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]