Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+6N2\s+vs\s+ICOM\s+706\s+MK\s+II\s+on\s+six\s+meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+6N2\s+vs\s+ICOM\s+706\s+MK\s+II\s+on\s+six\s+meters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten-Tec 6N2 vs ICOM 706 MK II on six meters (score: 1): Author: Jliving39@aol.com; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 11:43:05 EDT; Folks, Any thoughts how the 6N2 compares with the ICOM 706 MKII on six meters? Ten Tec has no new 6N2s available and no run date established although they say they plan to make more when parts are lo; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00250.html (7,189 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec 6N2 vs ICOM 706 MK II on six meters (score: 1): Author: <dmason@softconnect.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 10:45:53 -0500; Hi Jim, Can't compare them, but in regards to the availability, I just received mine last week after a 3-month wait. Don't know if they produced just enough to fill existing orders or if there's some; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00252.html (7,887 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec 6N2 vs ICOM 706 MK II on six meters (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 11:34:58 -0500; Jim, I had a 6n2 and "stupidly" replaced it with a 706mkIIG thinking I'd have both the VHF and the HF bands - I do, but I really wanted great performance on VHF. The 6n2 seemed to work a bit better f; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00254.html (9,031 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]