Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+PTOs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+PTOs\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten-Tec PTOs (score: 1): Author: "Phil Chambley Sr." <k4dpk@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 01:19:21 -0500; I haven't seen this mentioned in any discussion of re-builds, so I guess I will. Apart from the well-known "marble rolling through chewing gum" effect that the aging grease has on operation, there's; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00577.html (7,692 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec PTOs (score: 1): Author: Bob Towers <mm0rkt@beeb.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:53:36 +0000; state of the rest of the PTO. The cage looked like brass, but I suspect it was bronze because of the lack of wear. The race part of the tuning shaft was well necked down - I compared it with the new; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00578.html (7,214 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]