Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+\"Speculator\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+\"Speculator\"\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten Tec "Speculator" (score: 1): Author: <jack@w9owo.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:40:10 -0500; Following the dozens of e-mails regarding the marketing and sales practices of Ten Tec, I thought it might be nice to have a new reflector- maybe call it the "Speculator." It could be sort of like Fo; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00266.html (7,573 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec "Speculator" (score: 1): Author: Stephen Roberts <steverob@shoreham.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:58:41 -0500; Really, this is getting SO old. Ten Tec isn't a big company. Users might think of it as some huge outfit, but it's not. As a consequence they obviously have to be frugal about how they spend their mo; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00273.html (9,174 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec "Speculator" (score: 1): Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:43:28 -0600; Well it had credibility up until the Fox News comment....I have to disagree on that one...but I guess one would expect that from a gun advocating southern conservative...:-) I do agree on the potenti; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00281.html (9,346 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec "Speculator" (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:44:22 -0500; Ha! I like it. -- K8JHR -- Being a brand-new Ten Tec fan, I can sense another possibility for changing marketing strategy. Maybe Ten Tec has the market share that they feel they can handle while main; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00283.html (8,255 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]