Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+Eagle\s+noise\s+blanker\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+Eagle\s+noise\s+blanker\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten Tec Eagle noise blanker (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:01:10 -0600; not a DSP one, but an analog, hardware one, is that correct? I have seen a couple of You tube videos which show that the NB is very good at taking out RFI noise, but does the NB distort the received; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-11/msg00085.html (6,863 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Eagle noise blanker (score: 1): Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 22:52:54 +0100; John, The Eagle's NB is indeed an analog one, and yes, it does distort the radio's audio signal; ALL NB (by design) must do that. They reduce noise by cutting out part of the frequency spectrum, whic; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-11/msg00087.html (9,453 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Eagle noise blanker (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:34:25 -0600; Thanks for the information on the Ten Tec Eagle noise blanker. Right now I have a Kenwood TS950SD which has a pretty good noise blanker in it, in terms of it taking out much of the RFI crud I get, bu; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-11/msg00091.html (12,462 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Eagle noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "P.C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:50:16 +0000; Hi John, The eagle user manual is on line. It will give you the answers to most of your questions. Nice radio for the buck. Andy, W3LI Thanks for the information on the Ten Tec Eagle noise blanker. R; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-11/msg00092.html (13,408 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]