Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+in\s+general\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+in\s+general\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten Tec in general... (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:18:13 EST; Hello all, I was listening to some people on 40M early this morning talking about a friend who tried an Omni 6+ and returned it because he didn't like the low gain of the reciever. I am wondering if; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00771.html (7,364 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec in general... (score: 1): Author: K8bvj@aol.com; Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:24:17 EST; Todd, most guys are used to the noisy Jap rigs and they dont appreciate Ten Tec. Jack K8BVJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00772.html (7,470 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec in general... (score: 1): Author: Bill Miner <wg6h@postoffice.pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 09:48:55 -0800; Todd, The Omni VI+ has a very robust receiver with good sensitivity and low noise. However a common problem is that the switching diodes in the front end can be damaged by static which will reduce th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00777.html (8,322 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]