Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+tec\s+OmniVI\+\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+tec\s+OmniVI\+\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten tec OmniVI+ (score: 1): Author: William Hill <w3wh@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:53:42 -0400; My Omni VI+ loses a very significant amount of signal when either the 500hz or 250 hz on the 6.3 mhz board are selected. Does anyone have a suggestion what I should try to eliminate this condition? B; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00090.html (6,855 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ten tec OmniVI+ (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:14:44 -0400; How much signal drop are we talking about here in terms of S units? There is a jumper to add gain when these filters are installed. Is the jumper there? Carl Moreschi N4PY 58 Hogwood Rd Louisburg, NC; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00093.html (7,970 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ten tec OmniVI+ (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:59:13 +0000; Yes, how much of a drop? (fwiw, jumpers are on the 9MHz i.f. board and Bill's issue is with the 6.3MHz filters) Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@c; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00094.html (9,180 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Ten tec OmniVI+ (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:47:16 -0400; It's been about 20 years since I has an Omni VI so please forgive me about the jumpers. Carl Moreschi N4PY 58 Hogwood Rd Louisburg, NC 27549 www.n4py.com Barry N1EU How much signal drop are we talkin; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00095.html (9,533 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Ten tec OmniVI+ (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 23:21:54 +0200; First of all there is a jumper to move when using the CW filters because they have a higher insertion loss than the SSB filters. If you have not moved the jumper, that might be a reason. But, unfortu; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00098.html (9,192 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Ten tec OmniVI+ (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:28:38 -0400; Bill: I had the same problem with the 500 Hz filter in my Paragon. Selectivity was fine but insertion loss was higher than the other filters. I swapped in the 500 Hz filter from my Corsair and it was; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00113.html (9,060 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Ten tec OmniVI+ (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:06:58 +0000; The Ten-Tec filters don't age as gracefully as the Inrads so there's a reasonable chance that the TT filters are bad. Many folks posting to this thread continue to conflate 9MHz filters with 6.3MHz f; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00117.html (10,086 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]