Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Terminology\:\s+Orion\s+or\s+Orion\s+I\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Terminology\:\s+Orion\s+or\s+Orion\s+I\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Terminology: Orion or Orion I (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:38:16 +0000; <<<I tend to agree that the release of the Orion II should produce some "spin off" advantages for the Orion. (Let me make my point clear, there is no such thing as the Orion I. There is the Orion and; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01078.html (7,884 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Terminology: Orion or Orion I (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:03:07 -0500; I think we should accept the Company naming conventions. There is on the TT web site, an Orion, and an Orion II. Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01096.html (7,559 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Terminology: Orion or Orion I (score: 1): Author: Jim Miller <k4sqr@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:13:41 -0400; Stuart, I second your motion. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01097.html (7,832 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Terminology: Orion or Orion I (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:38:15 -0400; Well, history really does repeat itself-- my pet peeve since the early 60's has been people who insist on calling the Johnson Viking Ranger, the Ranger 1. Just because they came out with the Ranger 2; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01100.html (8,062 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Terminology: Orion or Orion I (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:20:28 -0400; OK, OK, mea culpa. Since I was one of the first to refer to the "O1" or "Orion 1" I accept my 20 lashes with a wet noodle. Enough already. So we don't have the O1 & O2. We just have the O and the O2.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01104.html (8,646 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Terminology: Orion or Orion I (score: 1): Author: Randy K7RAN <k7randy@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:46:11 -0600; Rob, well put. Also, perhaps an unconscious motivator which blocks against the "Orion 1" designation is that if one says "Orion" without the "1" one isn't reminded that something better has come alon; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01110.html (10,558 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Terminology: Orion or Orion I (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:12:57 +0000; I do not have a great problem with the Orion or Orion I, but the use of Argo for all the Argonauts drives me nuts, why, TT made a rig called the Argo. The low power version of the Scout. So, it would; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01111.html (10,617 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]