Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+\'7800\s+review\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+\'7800\s+review\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] The '7800 review (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:33:13 -0600; I just saw the Icom 7800 review for the first time. Without ragging on the reviewers, because I'm sure they are all good guys, this review tells me very, very little about the electronic performance; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00453.html (9,804 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] The '7800 review (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:17:27 EDT; Right on! QST is getting to be like a lot of other hobby magazines. They never met a stinker piece of gear. The old saw, "If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all," seems to apply.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00463.html (7,166 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] The '7800 review (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:06:32 -0400; At 09:33 PM 07/15/2004, al_lorona@agilent.com wrote: I just saw the Icom 7800 review for the first time. Without ragging on the reviewers, because I'm sure they are all good guys, this review tells m; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00472.html (8,185 bytes)
4. [TenTec] The '7800 review (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:37:52 -0400; Al (W6LX), your comments are right on the mark. There was an interesting discussion recently on eHam on this very topic: http://www.eham.net/articles/8608 Of all the manufacturers, Icom seems to prov; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00506.html (8,096 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]