- 21. Re: [TenTec] The future of The Orion I (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Malmgren" <janed@burgoyne.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:31:26 -0600
- Lee, your making way too much sense. look out for those tears. Ed K7UC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01057.html (8,119 bytes)
- 22. [TenTec] The future of The Orion I (score: 1)
- Author: "W. Engelke" <wengelke@charter.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:04:09 -0500
- I have had my Orion for about 5months, and have used it for many things - SSTV, contesting, CW, ragchewing, DXing, etc. I have had a few glitches, i.e., mysterious freeze-ups or unexpected behaviors.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01062.html (10,546 bytes)
- 23. Re: [TenTec] The future of The Orion I (score: 1)
- Author: "A. Sewell" <n5na@att.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:29:34 -0500
- Per W4PA on 7/21 "The DragonBall processor in the original Orion is up to the task of accomodating all the functionality of the transceiver itself..........................What I have said before - a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01065.html (10,258 bytes)
- 24. Re: [TenTec] The future of The Orion I (score: 1)
- Author: "Reg Unsworth" <reg.unsworth@btopenworld.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:59:09 -0000
- Try this link and click on "Do I know?" http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/news/bh/rumsfeld.shtml 73 Reg except once _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01073.html (14,256 bytes)
- 25. Re: [TenTec] The future of The Orion I (score: 1)
- Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:25:00 -0500
- I tend to agree that the release of the Orion II should produce some "spin off" advantages for the Orion. (Let me make my point clear, there is no such thing as the Orion I. There is the Orion and th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01077.html (11,375 bytes)
- 26. Re: [TenTec] The future of The Orion I (score: 1)
- Author: "john, ke5c" <ke5c@hot.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:51:12 -0500
- Pro II, or a 706 upgraded to a 706 Mk IIG, or the Omni V upgraded to a Omni VI+. In the history of things in the ham radio equipment circles, the release of the Orion II is no different. The release
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01079.html (9,689 bytes)
- 27. Re: [TenTec] The future of The Orion I (score: 1)
- Author: "M. P. Haynes" <k4beh@juno.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:30:33 -0400
- Maybe that's why all the crying of late--it has turned into an ONION! Pat-K4BEH On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:43:49 -0500 "holladayfd" <holladayfd@multipro.com> writes: -- -- _______________________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01085.html (11,807 bytes)
- 28. Re: [TenTec] The future of The Orion I (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:32:46 -0700
- Hi Randy, Sorry for the confusion. There is nothing wrong with the message that you referred to. The following message caused future messages from you to be moderated. Referring to auctions or auctio
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01107.html (11,765 bytes)
- 29. Re: [TenTec] The future of The Orion I (score: 1)
- Author: K4IA@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:33:49 EDT
- Incredible, - for want of a $9 part a $4000+ radio becomes obsolete and maybe even un-repairable! In this case, there has already been a post (from TT?) pointing out the "no longer recommended" messa
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01108.html (9,196 bytes)
- 30. Re: [TenTec] The future of The Orion I (score: 1)
- Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:02:02 -0400
- It's a problem with most every radio these days. I still keep my TS-520S around for the day when nothing else works. 73 Martin AA6E -- martin.ewing@gmail.com http://blog.aa6e.net ____________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01124.html (10,384 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu