Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Tower\s+Endorsement\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Tower\s+Endorsement\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Tower Endorsement (score: 1): Author: Jack Emerson <w4tje@lexcominc.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:18:49 -0400; Sorry for the off topic post (not really, I'm just trying to sound sincere), but I just wanted to say something nice about 2 ham brothers local to my community, and the work they did for me today. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00482.html (8,543 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Tower Endorsement (score: 1): Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:27:32 -0600; great story Jack! i agree on the discussion of the Orion. i find the standard Orion to be as fine a radio as i have ever used. Ten Tec CW is the finest period! i like the O so much i have two of them; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00483.html (6,963 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Tower Endorsement (score: 1): Author: Jack Emerson <w4tje@lexcominc.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:39:06 -0400; Tnx Jack, same story here. I use the O2 for both cw and ssb, and love it to death. Follow-up to the tower story: I just read on the Carolina Dx Association website that VU4, Andaman Islands dx-pediti; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00486.html (8,288 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Tower Endorsement (score: 1): Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:35:47 -0600; boy i can understand the lack of antenna, Jack. i wish you a "speedy recovery!" sadly the bands are the pitts these days. i can't wait until we have some sunspots again! i have thoroughly enjoyed my; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00487.html (7,089 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]