Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Very\s+nice\s+response\.\.\.\.thank\s+you\,\s+Dave\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Very\s+nice\s+response\.\.\.\.thank\s+you\,\s+Dave\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Very nice response....thank you, Dave. (score: 1): Author: "al sirois" <alsirois@roadrunner.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:30:11 -0500; N1mhc@arrl.net == Al, The original Delta had a remote VFO, which was the model 283. The Delta II had a VFO B internally for Split operation and there is no listing of a remote VFO for it. Dave WA3F -; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00152.html (9,076 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Very nice response....thank you, Dave. (score: 1): Author: "al sirois" <alsirois@roadrunner.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 04:39:28 -0500; Saturday morning Very nice for your explanation, thanks alsirois@roadrunner.com == N1mhc@arrl.net == Al, The original Delta had a remote VFO, which was the model 283. The Delta II had a VFO B interna; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00156.html (9,774 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]