Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+WOW\s+SERVICE\s+on\s+ARGO\s+V\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+WOW\s+SERVICE\s+on\s+ARGO\s+V\!\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: ny9h@arrl.net (Bill Steffey); Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 10:00:21 -0600; I think we should restrain our enthusiasm while praising : TT SERVICE ON A BRAND NEW RADIOS If and when I ever get my ORION; I do NOT want to be having to send it back for SERVICE...even quick servic; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00444.html (9,155 bytes)
2. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: ke9v@comcast.net (Jeffrey Davis); Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:18:56 -0500; * Bill Steffey <ny9h@arrl.net> [2002-11-23 11:05]: I was wondering when someone would put 2+2 together and figure out that touting GREAT service for a month old radio might not really be such a great; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00446.html (8,623 bytes)
3. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: w9wis@charter.net (Michael Melland); Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 10:36:42 -0600; Geeze Bill..... I don't know about Icom but about 10% of the Yaesu FT-817's develop a problem that takes out final transistors and other components. Sometimes within hours of being new. Five guys bou; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00447.html (9,810 bytes)
4. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: res0wsci@verizon.net (William Mansey; WA2PVK); Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:12:24 -0500; Hello Bill, I agree with you. Even the BEST service department is STILL a service department! BUT!!! The BEST service department is much better than having to wait months! I would MUCH prefer not hav; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00449.html (8,848 bytes)
5. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: k4wj@bellsouth.net (John/K4WJ); Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:57:24 -0500; Jeff You appear to be comparing "service" with "reliability" and these are two different issues. The reliability factor measures how long between failures. You sure don't want a new rig to fail soon; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00452.html (9,739 bytes)
6. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 14:21:10 -0500; I have to agree. All this talk about how great the service is makes me think they break a lot. I have only shipped one TenTec in for service, a Pegasus. They couldn't fix it so they gave me a refund; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00454.html (10,088 bytes)
7. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman); Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:23:10 -0500; Indeed, great service IS great service. As far as reliability is concerned, the radio is MOST likely to fail when it is brand new. All the electronics are going through the well known bathtub curve o; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00456.html (11,368 bytes)
8. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:27:35 -0800 (PST); Or is it simply a fact that all those users of the other brands who do send their radios in for service have nothing to be enthusiastic about, and therefore never talk about it? Can?t actually commen; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00457.html (10,160 bytes)
9. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman); Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:29:02 -0500; Jeff, Of course I understand your point. And I appreciate the humor. :) Of course, I would say you are a totally unreliable person if you shot me in the leg, but a great medical service technician if; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00458.html (9,652 bytes)
10. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:42:32 -0500; They ALL are prone to failure. So what? My new FT-1000D failed within two weeks of ownership. My new Kenwood TS-950SD failed within two months of ownership. My new Yaesu FT-2400 failed to power up ou; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00464.html (9,072 bytes)
11. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:28:13 -0600; My $0.02. I have 3 Tentec's, 2 Yaesu's, an ICOM and a Kenwood. One of each has been back for service. Tentec gave the best turn-a-round of any of the repairs. ICOM was the worst. Tentec was the least; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00474.html (11,389 bytes)
12. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 01:06:51 -0800; My limited experience with Ten-Tec has shown them to be very good at product (and customer) service. However, the quality of technical information is dependent upon the person you reach (as it is wit; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00475.html (9,054 bytes)
13. [TenTec] WOW SERVICE on ARGO V! (score: 1): Author: bohnovic@bellsouth.net (John Bohnovic); Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 07:38:51 -0500; Gary, Shooting a person in the leg so that you can provide first aid is not a good analogy to the service and reliability issue. Jeff's analogy is out of context. No human has a warranty provided whe; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00489.html (11,021 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]