Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Wish\s+List\s+for\s+ORION\-III\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:38:38 +0200
I hope Barry is right. Although we've been through all of this before, we are all a bit farther down the road than we were a year ago. I don't have much use for a band scope, but understand and accep
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00137.html (10,993 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: P C A <xtraham58@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:02:38 -0400
Great ideas RICK. I like the modular concept, and what you want when you want. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00139.html (12,819 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 08:23:43 -0400
Rick, This is all too outdated a way to make a transceiver now. The new best way is to create 100% digital data right at the antenna connection. Then everything is done in software. The new Flex 6500
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00140.html (12,071 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:27:32 +0000
Nicely spec'd Rick. I would add: don't undersize the radio and give up ergonomics in the process. For example, the Orion's VFO/ANT switch matrix (lower left) is genius. If anything, give it more real
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00141.html (14,349 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 05:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
I agree Carl.  Hardware is too expensive these days, it's gone the way of how labor use to be cheap, and now it isn't.  it'll be minimal hardware, and a  nexus of software.   73, -Eric W9WLW http://w
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00142.html (14,935 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:22:44 +0000
Inexpensive DDC/DUC hardware eh? Any idea what the Xilinx XC6VLX130T FPGA chip that is used in the Flex 6700 goes for? 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing li
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00143.html (15,934 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 15:40:10 +0200
Carl, Yes AND NO! For all of us operating at home (alone), YES. At least as far as technology goes. Not sure if operator acceptance is there yet. But, for a Field Day, especially a larger club with 5
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00144.html (11,803 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 15:41:05 +0200
Plus the cost of a suitable computer required to drive it to full specs! 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) Inexpensive DDC/DUC hardware eh? Any idea what the Xilinx XC6VLX130T FPGA chip that i
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00145.html (16,333 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: John Henry <jhenry@tentec.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:08:32 -0400
Very good discussion. In my opinion, eventually, SDR type transceivers will probably be the norm from all manufacturers. But I believe that there will still be a market in the amateur market and the
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00146.html (11,172 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: John Henry <jhenry@tentec.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:22:42 -0400
dabgum it, in the paragraph on the SDRs.... Meant to say..... That if you can add I&Q outputs, you DON'T need the external SDRs. providing of course the quality level is good enough for the sound car
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00147.html (8,042 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 16:37:42 +0200
"One thing we have to do is to keep in mind the differing requirements from many different levels of ham usages. Quite varied." Which is why you make it modular... - Rick ____________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00148.html (7,241 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: Brian Mullaney <bpm@lintech.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:42:38 -0400
On 4/8/2014 8:23 AM, Carl Moreschi wrote: This is all too outdated a way to make a transceiver now. The new best way is to create 100% digital data right at the antenna connection. Then everything is
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00149.html (9,425 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 10:46:30 -0400
NO the 6500 does not behave like the 5000. The 6500 has a clip point of S9 + 80 DB. That's a HUGE signal. Carl Moreschi N4PY 58 Hogwood Rd Louisburg, NC 27549 www.n4py.com For all of us operating at
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00150.html (12,710 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:56:23 +0000
I suspect that the DDC/DUC market will evolve with 3rd parties offering add-on virtual front panels that hang off the PC or the rig as peripherals, or perhaps hang off the network. You're probably no
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00151.html (9,126 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: "73@73.am" <73@73.am>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:01:17 -0500
One can install Michelin tires on a Yugo, but it will still not handle like a Mercedes. -Paul _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00152.html (7,947 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 17:14:40 +0200
You may very well be correct, Carl. Rob hasn't sent me any data on the 6500 yet. I was assuming its performance and behavior will be in the ballpark of the 5000. Just shows to go ya, assumptions are
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00153.html (14,633 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:01:05 -0400
I have now fully integrated the Woodbox radio Tmate2 with all my software. The Tmate2 has 3 knobs and 9 buttons and you can choose from a list of over 60 functions to set for each control. Additional
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00156.html (15,570 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: Steven Kline <skline4@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:43:28 -0500
John Henry, All the discussion on these great features and more this past week, resurected one particular feature that Ive lost touch with from Ten Tec - the external high definition pan adapter vide
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00157.html (13,084 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 22:22:25 +0200
Excellent. That is exactly the POD I had in mind when I wrote that! 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) I have now fully integrated the Woodbox radio Tmate2 with all my software. The Tmate2 has
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00162.html (18,143 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 18:10:22 -0500
I won't buy a high end radio that is point and click...just ain't happening. Full front panel...stand alone from a separate computer. Guess i am old school and I don't expect it to change. Don't care
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00168.html (20,679 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu