Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Wow\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Wow\!\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Wow! (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:09:16 -0400; I was wrong about the 20% LOTW QSL rate. I just checked it and for me it is 9.6% 73, Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- From: "Rick Williams"; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00333.html (9,057 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Wow! (score: 1): Author: "Bill Gaines AD8P" <ad8p@wcoil.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:31:26 -0400; 18.37% here based on 31,200 QSO's uploaded As an analyst I would then advise you to make more QSO's so your percentage will go up ;>) Bill AD8P -- Original Message -- From: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00334.html (10,429 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Wow! (score: 1): Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:36:34 -0400; I must be QSOing a LOT of TenTec users (to keep it reflector related <g>) LOTW stats: 57,233 QSO's in the log 13,318 QSL's -or23.26% 73, Ted W4NZ --Original Message-- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00335.html (9,555 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Wow! (score: 1): Author: "Bill Gaines AD8P" <ad8p@wcoil.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:37:20 -0400; As a whole system there are only 6.46% qsl's.123,500,000 qso's and 8,000,000 qsl's Not a good response but it's cheap and easy to use once it is set up. Setting it up wasn't the easiest thing in the; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00336.html (12,017 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Wow! (score: 1): Author: k9zw@mac.com; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:37:56 -0700; Afraid under my old call I didn't make even 1/2 of Carl N4PY's achieved LOTW QSL rate for DX QSOs, though the rate was better for domestic QSLs. I average 90%+ on direct DX QSLs, or better stated 20-; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00337.html (8,776 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Wow! (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:45:02 -0400; My QSO's are over a 30 year period with the higher amount being the older ones. I suspect that has something to do with the low rate. But there are only about 15,000 hams registered world wide to LOT; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00338.html (11,791 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Wow! (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:54:49 -0600; I would agree that the process of setting up LOTW is rather cumbersome and I work in the industry so I am not a stranger to any of this weird science. I for one am very disappointed on my return rat; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00339.html (13,446 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Wow! (score: 1): Author: k9zw@mac.com; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:49:36 -0700; That makes for a uptake of roughly of 1/2 of 1 percent. No matter how good an implimentation of a system is, with so few using the service it isn't going to go very far. Without the ARRL, and their f; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00340.html (8,196 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Wow! (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:45:04 -0500; Mine is running about 25%. Still, it could be a lot better. 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com --Original Message-- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@c; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00341.html (9,662 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Wow! (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:50:33 -0500; Sorry - that's what distinguishes LotW from eQSL. The cert process is what assures that it is you who appended your data. That's what drove part of the high cost to develop it. This makes it nearly; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00342.html (14,612 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Wow! (score: 1): Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:51:20 -0400; Hi Ted, The higher percentage is because you are a contester. That increases your percentage of LotW QSLs. My percentage is even higher than that. I can think of several reasons for this. BTW IMO if; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00359.html (8,605 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]