Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Yaesu\s+FT\-1000D\s+RF\s+Compressor\s+versus\s+Ten\-Tec\s+715\s+RF\s+Clipper\.\.\.\s+not\s+the\s+same\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Yaesu FT-1000D RF Compressor versus Ten-Tec 715 RF Clipper... not the same. (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:31:35 -0700
Quote: "Dear Rick, With all due respect, I'm interested in finding out why you are using the Ten Tec RF processor with a 1000D when the 1000D has one of the best RF speech processors ever to be inclu
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00314.html (8,429 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT-1000D RF Compressor versus Ten-Tec 715 RF Clipper... not the same. (score: 1)
Author: "David & Chris Drake" <drakes@psci.net>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:30:27 -0400
Jerry, you are quite right regarding the design. But I do wonder if everyone knows the difference or if TT is simply selling them as a "better" processor. If everyone has the right information, most
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00316.html (10,507 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT-1000D RF Compressor versus Ten-Tec 715 RF Clipper... not the same. (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 07:34:35 +0200
Not sure about FT1000D, but FT1000MP/MkV actually performs RF clipping, and it's very cheap, using TA7302P FM IF Amplifier. Users of "external RF Clippers" must be aware of the fact that the processe
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00318.html (8,631 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT-1000D RF Compressor versus Ten-Tec 715 RF Clipper... not the same. (score: 1)
Author: Walter Hopper <waltk5vv@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 07:51:44 -0500
*I don't usually get involved in Ten Tec debates.... but I must reveal my findings related to the Ten Tec Model 715. I must admit, that I was dubious of the Ten Tec claims that were made concerning i
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00320.html (10,874 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT-1000D RF Compressor versus Ten-Tec 715 RF Clipper... not the same. (score: 1)
Author: Henry Mackey <kb9cqo@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 09:41:20 -0400 (EDT)
Walter K5VV, Your email ties it all up for me! Thank you sir. When you put in that you were using the TT 715 with a Jupiter I couldn't read fast enough to learn the outcome. I won't have an amp, but
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00321.html (8,650 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT-1000D RF Compressor versus Ten-Tec 715 RF Clipper... not the same. (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:36:19 -0400
I purchased the 715 .... well... er.... just because I can. So I am really pleased to read such positive notes. Happy trails. == Anonymous - K8JHR == _______________________________________________ T
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-06/msg00003.html (7,136 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT-1000D RF Compressor versus Ten-Tec 715 RF Clipper... not the same. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Schatzberg " <wow_chf@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:31:35 +0000
Test message. --Original Message-- From: Richards Sent: 6/2/2009 4:36:19 AM To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment Subject: Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT-1000D RF Compressor versus Ten-Tec 715 RF Clipper... not
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-06/msg00004.html (7,897 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu