Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ditsnbits\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ditsnbits\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1): Author: Martin Ewing <martin@aa6e.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:52:44 -0500; Couple of questions to the group about TT's Orion firmware support. 1 - I have submitted a couple of bug reports to ditsnbits@tentec.com, but there has never been any acknowledgement or reply. Is tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00529.html (7,540 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:16:38 -0600; ditsnbits@tentec.com, That's typical. I've very occasionally gotten a direct response, but it's not the usual pattern. Doesn't mean they aren't reading and paying attention. my not Consider the volu; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00532.html (7,710 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:37:06 EST; Martin, Same for me, no direct response, usually ( I did get one many monthes ago) I hope they are hitting it hard, as sure looks like they have a basket full of issues to fix. I am on 1.366, it work; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00539.html (7,423 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:38:44 -0600; Hope this is taken in the positive spirit it is intended. I've sent in a couple of e-mails about faults to dtsnbits, but have felt a bit un-rewarded for my efforts. Dits&Bits doesn't respond with an; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00547.html (10,251 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1): Author: "holladayfd" <holladayfd@multipro.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:49:20 -0600; Re the Mars Rover, put another few million dollars and a few hundred tecnicians on the job and you might get the same results! Frank, K4VMO -- Original Message -- From: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00548.html (11,156 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:58:02 -0600; What would it take for an e-mail auto-responder? From: "holladayfd" <holladayfd@multipro.com> Reply-To: tentec@contesting.com To: <tentec@contesting.com> Subject: Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits? Date: Wed, 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00549.html (12,338 bytes)
7. [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:42:44 -0800 (PST); K5SF suggested "We got information about it's symptoms, cause, and ultimately it's fix. If it works for NASA and IBM, why can't we also be in on ditsnbits? . . . It would be almost a requirement to h; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00554.html (7,668 bytes)
8. RE: [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:25:55 -0600; That would not make good business sense, Customers should never be told to go somewhere else. I would hate to think there is only one person who works at rf-sqared on the radio's microcode, That woul; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00555.html (9,467 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1): Author: "K Van Horn" <W7SV@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:49:34 -0600; AMEN!! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00559.html (9,020 bytes)
10. RE: [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1): Author: Bill Mahaffey <w6eet@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:15:32 -0800; FWIW, I have been told by a TT employee that the fw guy is out of town on business. scary bill w6eet -- Are you a libertarian? go to <http://www.lp.org/quiz/> to find out ___________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00561.html (8,502 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]