Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+dual\s+VFOs\s+in\s+OmniVII\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+dual\s+VFOs\s+in\s+OmniVII\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] dual VFOs in OmniVII (score: 1): Author: ataylor@heracles.llnl.gov (Allan G. Taylor); Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 09:43:20 -0800 (PST); The recent trend in contesting is to use TWO completely separate xcvrs all under computer control to do some parallel operating (while still only transmitting on one xcvr at a time). The software is; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00078.html (7,762 bytes)
2. [TenTec] dual VFOs in OmniVII (score: 1): Author: N6TT@worldnet.att.net (Steve Massey); Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 14:22:47 -0800; under transmitting using on a At still Hi Grant, Yes the computer control is a real treat indeed....I dont usually read pass the first line on most msgs and yours starting with two radio's for contes; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00082.html (10,438 bytes)
3. [TenTec] dual VFOs in OmniVII (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Tue, 9 Dec 97 14:33:40 -0500; Actually, what you describe is not typically done. What usually happens is an operator will use a computer program or voice keyer to transmit a CQ on one rig, while tuning for stations on the other r; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00099.html (9,055 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]