Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ft\/m\s+or\s+m\/ft\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ft\/m\s+or\s+m\/ft\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ft/m or m/ft? (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:47:24 -0400; Your memory is wrong Rick...but I know how you got there because I recognized the "3048" sequence. That is actually .3048 m/ft, not 3.048 ft/m. As someone else stated the actual value of ft/m is 3.28; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00408.html (6,724 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] ft/m or m/ft? (score: 1): Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <n4nt_m_o_hyder@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:18:38 -0400; For anyone interested, a free program named "Convert" by Josh Madison can figure all this stuff out. More information here: http://www.joshmadison.com/software/convert/ I've used it a long time and l; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00410.html (8,013 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] ft/m or m/ft? (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:27:41 -0700; Bill you are CORRECT. Hey, I thought you were retired! I got my labels backwards, the numbers are still correct and it's my memory that's wrong, which is why you are correct, Bill. Guess I have been; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00419.html (8,054 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]