Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+headphone\s+alarmists\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+headphone\s+alarmists\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: <johnmb@nc.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:39 +0000; I agree...one "slip" with headphone of ANY brand, is not going to cause permanent hearing loss, for heavens sake! Much ado about nothing, indeed,,,, John K5MO ________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00912.html (6,449 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: Lee A Crocker <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:39:29 -0800 (PST); Be very careful, Its my understanding that even writing about headphones can cause a hearing loss HUH? WHAT? I CAN'T HEAR U Seems to me it isn't the headphones that are the problem it's the crankin u; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00919.html (6,704 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:08:51 -0600; How many times have you heard one give a signal report of 59 or such then followed by "can you repeat your name and QTH"? Now looking at that analogy of that report, the 5 = Perfectly readable, and 9; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00922.html (8,541 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <n4nt_m_o_hyder@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:24:27 -0500; Operators are not deaf from using TDE headphones for years, those are fresh on the market. Folks have talked about Sony, Heil and every other brand imaginable on this reflector and NOBODY has ever su; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00925.html (9,610 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:43:17 -0500; N4NT: can run our audio signal gain into the headphones at a lower level than if it had to overcome more ambient noise. Exactly. Headphones do not cause hearing loss...excessive volume causes hearing; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00928.html (7,383 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: Lee A Crocker <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 06:36:59 -0800 (PST); report of 59 or such then followed by "can you repeat your name and QTH"? Now looking at that analogy of that report, the 5 = Perfectly readable, and 9 = Extremely strong signals. From that we must; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00931.html (7,680 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: <cnagel@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:15:48 -0600; Hey, people, be careful with your comments. There's lots of air between you and a speaker but hardly any between a headphone clamped on your head and your ears. Make a conscious effort to monitor the; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00933.html (9,341 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: "M. P. Haynes" <k4beh@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:01:54 -0500; CAN YOU NOT HEAR ME NOW???? CAN YOU NOT HEAR ME NOW???? CAN YOU NOT HEAR ME NOW???? Pat-K4BEH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00935.html (9,619 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:09:56 EST; Well... JUST BE SURE (CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?) YOU DON'T RUB YOUR EYE AFTER HANDELING THE CHINESE PHONES or you will get LEAD POISONING IN EYES !! Who knows what that will do, it would be worse than on; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00936.html (7,796 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:46:05 -0500; Or wife came into the shack, dog barked, coffee spilled etc. etc. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00968.html (8,976 bytes)
11. [TenTec] headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: <hcawthra@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:23:25 -0800; Common sense, where has it gone! 73 Howard KA6IOB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00979.html (8,001 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: <k9wwt@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:35:01 -0600; I agree - let's move on to something a little more productive. Enough of the headphone issue. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00981.html (8,433 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] headphone alarmists (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:20:28 -0500; True enough ! sound pressure levels on the db A scale. They ran something like this, although my recollection of the numbers may be slightly off, by a matter of a few dBA. 80 dBA - unlimited time of; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00982.html (10,001 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]