Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+magic\s+wire\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+magic\s+wire\s+antennas\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] magic wire antennas (score: 1): Author: K5lxz@wmconnect.com; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 13:01:09 EDT; Hello All, I remember the Maxcom review in QST and it reminded me of an anatenna I made back in 1973 that a now silent key refered to as a "magic wire antenna". We were asked to demonstrate ham radio; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00196.html (7,510 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] magic wire antennas (score: 1): Author: Curt <k3ey@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:18:11 -0700 (PDT); What?s really funny is I also remember all the talk that review caused about how it was a dummy load. Please then, someone on here explain why they are still in business selling their "dummy loads"?; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00199.html (8,686 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] magic wire antennas (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:26:31 -0700; When I was in the U.S. Army Signal Corps about 35 years ago, we often had to come up on weird frequencies at a moments notice. Using this "B&W dummy load", we were able to establish communications al; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00203.html (10,586 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] magic wire antennas (score: 1): Author: "Lyle Dunlap" <lyle3dd@grics.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 13:47:21 -0500; Curt The why of it is: There are still dummies willing to pay. Give a few years and you have a new crop of them. Or as the saying goes, "a sucker born every minute" Lyle W9FCX _______________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00204.html (7,169 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] magic wire antennas (score: 1): Author: "jrhallas@optonline.net" <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:41:18 -0400; Curt, I am happy to share my opinion about the B&W "folded dipole". I have modeled one and think I remember that it is down about 10 dB compared to a resonant dipole, at least on the frequencies I lo; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00205.html (10,823 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] magic wire antennas (score: 1): Author: John L Merrill <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:37:16 -0400; Didn't B&W sell one of those and even TenTec just a little while ago? N1JM _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00206.html (7,387 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] magic wire antennas (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 16:08:44 -0500; There is a fine line on what you can get away with selling over Internet. As long as they do not use the U. S. mails, it can be hard to prove interstate commerce fraud. As long as certain claims are; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00207.html (8,890 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] magic wire antennas (score: 1): Author: Curt <k3ey@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 21:48:29 -0700 (PDT); Back in the 80's when I lived at a place where everything, ?antenna wise? was out including verticals for reasons I won't get into, my only option "if" I wanted to operate was a B&W folded dipole. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00225.html (13,180 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]