Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+microphones\s+and\s+ten\s+tec\s+gear\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+microphones\s+and\s+ten\s+tec\s+gear\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] microphones and ten tec gear (score: 1): Author: prosolar@sssnet.com (mike bryce); Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 10:23:46 -0400; Boys and girls. I've always been a CW op and rarely use SSB. When I do, I get reports of "bassy' audio. I've tried D-104, Sure 444D and a handful of others. Now I know this has been bounced around a; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00099.html (7,959 bytes)
2. [TenTec] microphones and ten tec gear (score: 1): Author: k6sdw@arrl.net (Eddy Avila); Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 15:03:37 -0000; Mike......same problem with my Corsair II, crappy transmit audio reports until I found a Low-Z Shure mike and now sounding great according to reports!! In Corsair II manual TT claims you can use eith; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00100.html (9,032 bytes)
3. [TenTec] microphones and ten tec gear (score: 1): Author: malonej@c2i2.com (Jack Malone); Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 09:38:17 -0700; Hi Mike: I have tried the following mics: TT 701 TT 705 Heil Radio Shack Astatic D-104 Did not like any of the above. Have settled on the Shure 526T. By rewiring the base with white wire direct to am; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00101.html (9,616 bytes)
4. [TenTec] microphones and ten tec gear (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 09:48:15 -0700 (PDT); I bet your carrier set points are not adjusted correctly. The D-104 should NEVER give "bassy" audio (unless you've modified it!) Your carrier setpoint could be set way up the filter curve and that wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00102.html (8,694 bytes)
5. [TenTec] microphones and ten tec gear (score: 1): Author: justo@maplenet.net (j); Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 12:25:31 -0500; ......same problem with my Corsair II, crappy transmit audio reports until I found a Low-Z Shure mike and now sounding great according to reports!! eddy, w/regards to your set-up w/the low-z shure mi; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00103.html (7,821 bytes)
6. [TenTec] microphones and ten tec gear (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 14:59:09 -0400; If the culprit is an improper setting of carrier set point (aka "carrier offset"), then you should notice your RECEIVED audio as sounding "bassy" as well. If so, it is almost definitely this adjustme; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00104.html (8,998 bytes)
7. [TenTec] microphones and ten tec gear (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 17:10:47 -0700; On the other hand, a mike like the D-104, using a crystal element has a very high Z demand for its load. The question then becomes is 10K ohms high impedance or is 100K ohms high impedance. Most desi; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00108.html (10,026 bytes)
8. [TenTec] microphones and ten tec gear (score: 1): Author: kf2hc@home.com (Brian - KF2HC); Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 07:37:20 -0400; My wife and I have used a D-104, a Heil Pro Set 5 (with HC-5 element) and a Ten-Tec 705 with our Omni VI Plus. We received no bad reports with the D-104 but she wanted a headset with a boom mike so I; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00111.html (8,155 bytes)
9. [TenTec] microphones and ten tec gear (score: 1): Author: amishbuggy37@yahoo.com (Larry Gibbs); Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 08:00:53 -0700 (PDT); Mike, I have a Heil desk mike with HC-5 so-called full range element. Audio reports (1 is best): 1. Heil with boost switch in. 2. Ten-Tec desk mike. 3. Heil full range. This has been described as bad; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00200.html (8,357 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]