Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+omni\s+6\s+plus\s+question\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] omni 6 plus question (score: 1)
Author: CROCDONZ1@aol.com
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:54:22 EST
i have purchased and installed both of the 2.8 inrad filters. i have them installed in the 250 hz cw and nar 2 slots. is this ok? the thing i have observed is when i have them selected, its like i ha
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00157.html (6,629 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] omni 6 plus question (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:10:07 -0500
Totally wrong. The 6.3mhz 2.8 goes in the 2.4 slot and the 9mhz 2.8 replaces the stock 2.4 filter. They do not go in the 250hz and N slots. N4LQ. If I were home and had the book in front of me I woul
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00159.html (8,161 bytes)

3. RE: [TenTec] omni 6 plus question (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:58:46 -0800
Steve already answered part of this. There is indeed a preamp and I don't recall its exact amplification but it's probably 10dB. As I recall, the preamp may be switched off. If your rig previously ha
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00161.html (8,479 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] omni 6 plus question (score: 1)
Author: "Don Steele" <dsteele@IowaTelecom.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:48:06 -0600
Don,I had an Omni 6+ with the 2,8 Inrad filters.I installed the 2.8 in place of the factory 2.4 filters.I then installed 1.8 in both IF's for narrow SSB reception.This leaves your other slots for CW
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00184.html (8,469 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] omni 6 plus question (score: 1)
Author: CROCDONZ1@aol.com
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:05:33 EST
thanks to all who have responded. i guess i will take the rig back apart and replace the 2.4 filters with the 2.8... don-kd9mf _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenT
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00185.html (7,210 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu