Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+omni\s+VII\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+omni\s+VII\s*$/: 96 ]

Total 96 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:02:02 -0500; John, I think the easiest way is to contact TenTec and ask for the cables for the AUX Receiver modification for the 588. (No soldering or drilling required) Then purchase a FLEX 1500 (or similar mult; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00016.html (8,746 bytes)
62. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:12:35 -0400; Hi Gary , thanks for your help . Will I a computer to run the 1500 ? or just the monitor to show the panadapter ? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00017.html (9,540 bytes)
63. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:42:11 -0500; You'll need a computer to run the FLEX 1500. See their page http://www.flex-radio.com/Products.aspx?topic=F1.5k_features for details. It could be an older computer. 73, Gary - AB9M __________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00023.html (10,803 bytes)
64. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:37:22 -0400; Thanks Gary I just went there . John kb2huk _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00026.html (11,485 bytes)
65. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 23:42:41 -0400; Hi Gary -- Are the directions for this in N4PY's README file? I was holding off on doing this, myself, because I was under some silly impression the modification was difficult and involved soldering; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00030.html (8,366 bytes)
66. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "N4PY2" <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:01:54 -0400; The directions for this are in the N4PY help file for the Pegasus Plus program. Just search for "Using the RX-320, RX-340, Pegasus, or Jupiter with the Omni VII". Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell D; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00031.html (9,796 bytes)
67. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:09:21 -0400; Thanks again ! John molenda kb2huk _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-10/msg00037.html (10,385 bytes)
68. [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: Richard Bell <richfbell@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:47:15 -0800 (PST); I am planning to take the dive and buy an Omni VII. Any thoughts, advice? I am the current owner of a Drake TR7 and Kenwood 830S (purchased in '82 by me). So it's well past time for me to invest; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00579.html (7,526 bytes)
69. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:52:06 -0600; W5BXE, Why not the Eagle? The Eagle looks good for the type of ham you describe yourself as being. And it would go over better with the XYL vs. the cost of the VII. The VII sounds more like a contest; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00580.html (7,386 bytes)
70. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:54:22 +0000 (UTC); If you do any CW, you'll want the 500Hz & 300 Hz filters. They work well on digital, also unless you want a waterfall with wider bandpass. I'm not a great fan of internal tuners. The used VII I found; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00581.html (8,021 bytes)
71. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: Richard Bell <richfbell@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:00:09 -0800 (PST); QSL - I'lll give it a closer look. Thanks! W5BXE, Why not the Eagle? The Eagle looks good for the type of ham you describe yourself as being. And it would go over better with the XYL vs. the cost; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00582.html (8,334 bytes)
72. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: Richard Bell <richfbell@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:02:42 -0800 (PST); I had pretty much decided I wouldn't but the tuner option. I've got a couple of tuners and I don't mind turning knobs. The Omni looks like a great radio. I believe I'd be happy with it. Thanks!; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00583.html (9,464 bytes)
73. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: Jack Mandelman <modelman@ieee.org>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:12:06 -0500; I agree with Dave's comment about the internal ATU. In my opinion, the internal ATU in my Omni VII does not do a good job of matching. My external auto ATU does much better. You will also have to get; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00584.html (9,153 bytes)
74. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:08:32 -0500; Just do it. If you don't need the complexity of the K3 and the fact you can operate it by either computer or by front panel controls, and the audio is so good... and ...and... the receiver is so good; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00585.html (8,087 bytes)
75. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:23:32 -0500; MY TUNER WORKS GREAT, I COMPARE IT WITH MY 238C. I USE IT ON A 315FT 80M ZEPP BOTH TUNERS WILL TUNE FROM 160 TO 10M Just do it. If you don't need the complexity of the K3 and the fact you can operate; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00586.html (8,701 bytes)
76. [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: "Frankie Hunt" <fhunt@bvunet.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:03:29 -0500; The Omni VII is an excellent choice. One thing to consider; If you ever consider remote operation of the Omni VII then the built in ATU is an asset worth having. I too use an external antenna tuner (; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00591.html (7,009 bytes)
77. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: Mark DeBord <markinkpt@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:16:01 -0500; I absolutely love my Omni VII!! I had one and traded "up" to the Orion II. I loved that radio too, but really missed my Omni VII. As time went on, I had a chance to get another Omni VII. As more time; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00607.html (8,412 bytes)
78. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:32:01 -0500; YES I AGREE I HAVE BOTH ORIONII AND OMNI VII W3KRQ I absolutely love my Omni VII!! I had one and traded "up" to the Orion II. I loved that radio too, but really missed my Omni VII. As time went on, I; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00608.html (8,676 bytes)
79. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 07:44:03 -0800 (PST); I agree too . I have the 0II and the Omni VII .I reallt like both radios 73 John wb4qda YES I AGREE I HAVE BOTH ORIONII AND OMNI VII W3KRQ I absolutely love my Omni VII!! I had; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00618.html (9,546 bytes)
80. [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: jliving39@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:27:10 +0000 (UTC); Folks, The OMNI VII controls (multi, pbt/bw,af/rf, and rit/xit) are very wobbly. Realize they are encoders and not pots and maybe never will be really tight. . Does anyone know if they can be; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00274.html (7,165 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]