Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+openwire\s+feed\s+OT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+openwire\s+feed\s+OT\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:33:24 -0800; Actually your answer is also incorrect, Randy. (but correct for the tuner I showed the link to) The tuner I showed the link to is a different one than the one I was referring to. My mistake. Quote fr; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00006.html (11,310 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: Mike Gorniak <mgorniak@genesiswireless.us>; Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:42:16 -0600; It's not mistakenly called an antenna tuner. It's called an antenna tuner because it tunes the antenna. It even tunes antennas for people who do not believe it is doing so. Mike NM7X ________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00008.html (8,066 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:49:47 -0500; Sorry, but that's misleading. An ATU when installed between your rig and your coax does not have a way to selectively tune just the antenna. It simply provides an impedance match from the rig to the; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00009.html (8,138 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>; Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:02:33 -0800; Why would you not connect also the shields together on the outside? jerome - va7vv _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00011.html (8,751 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:53:13 -0000; In the "old days" that's why they were called transmatches. 2 things that come to mind as honest to goodness antenna tuners are the device you use with your Steppir antenna, and a scewdriver type of; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00017.html (9,565 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: Mike Gorniak <mgorniak@genesiswireless.us>; Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:26:58 -0600; It's not misleading in any way. There was no qualifier about whether the tuning was being selectively applied to just the antenna. It will tune the antenna at either side of the transmission line. Th; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00018.html (9,193 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:46:12 EST; actually you are both right, and wrong. According to Kurt Sterba, , it does tune the ANTENNA SYSTEM by matching the antenna to the radio. so no, it does not tune the antenna, but yes it tunes the ant; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00021.html (9,483 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:30:40 -0500; Well, I would not call it an antenna tuner. It does not affect the electrical properties of the antenna itself. The antenna's physical properties do not change either. So, if at the operating frequen; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00028.html (10,077 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:32:30 -0500; Well no, you still will not alter the antenna. Its still the wrong length or whatever it was in the first place. You just transform the impedance out at the antenna, before the feedline, rather than; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00029.html (8,528 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: "Orlando J. Palmer" <bunchy@choicecable.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 21:53:26 -0400; Hi all DITTO 73 DE KP4CY _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00036.html (10,933 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:55:16 -0600; snip FWIW The impedance of free space (and a vacuumn) is approximately 377 Ohms. It too is referred to as Zo and is a physical quantity. A horn antenna in radar or microwave serves as a match from th; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00038.html (7,630 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: "JAMES HANLON" <knjhanlon@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:58:25 -0700; Paul, Fair Radio probably still sells shielded 300 ohm twinlead that is about the same diameter as RG8. You could simply connect a section long enough to suit your purposes to your open wire feed lin; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00039.html (8,928 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: "K. Indart" <kitdart@ntelos.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:30:41 -0500; Keith, I have two questions: Do you keep the two coax pieces separated by the same spacing as your feed line,...or can you make ONE hole in the wall/window and feed both coax through one hole ? Does; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00053.html (10,171 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:05:10 -0500; Ken (and others) Oh, man, true confession time here :-). I've only done what I described one time, years ago. I built a coax parallel feed line for a loop antenna. The coax went from the back of the; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00054.html (10,231 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:20:03 -0800; Guys, this may be a stupid question, but if you use two parallel pieces of (long) coax, wouldn't you have twice the loss. On the other hand, resistors in parallel would mean half the loss. In any cas; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00055.html (11,086 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: "Scott Harwood" <scotth@hsc.edu>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:24:30 -0500; I run mine through the wall with two pieces of RG-8 coax WITHOUT the shield. Spacing is same as balanced line and uses two separate holes. Scott K4VWK -- Original Message -- From: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00057.html (12,666 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: Randy Russe3ll <lord_russell53@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 10:47:18 -0800 (PST); Well, it doesn't have to be that hard. For the original poster who just wanted a temporary set-up, the easiest thing is to bring them through a window sash. I simply crack my shack window 3 1/2 ", ru; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00059.html (14,999 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:21:04 -0500; I don't necessarily recommend "two-coax balanced line", although in fact I do use a short piece going through a wall (yes. feedthroughs are a good sol'n, too) for one end of my rhombic (QST, Nov 2004; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00061.html (13,810 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:37:48 -0500; If you use the coax as coax, all the fields are within the coax so relative spacing between them doesn't matter. I tied the shields together on both ends of the run so the signal will divide properly; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00062.html (13,510 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] openwire feed OT (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:40:46 -0600; Folks, if you can run or intend to run coax through the wall or window or whatever, then run the balanced line the same route. Better yet you do not have to deal with the loss in the coax. The fact i; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00067.html (9,067 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]