Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+re\:\s+No\s+6M\s+on\s+the\s+Orion\s+\(WTB\:\s+Ten\-Tec\s+526\s+6N2\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] re: No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: khopper@uchicago.edu (Ken Hopper)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:49:32 -0500
== Quoting from Ken Bourne Mon, 8 Apr 2002 11:28:27 http://www.n9vv.com/w6hk.html "Regarding RF power, the ORION's output will be a ROBUST 100 watts, 100% duty cycle, into ANY SWR! A higher output is
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00223.html (9,510 bytes)

2. [TenTec] re: No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: wb9iog@revealed.net (MIKE SOUHRADA)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:33:26 -0500
HI Guys Saw the post and know of one in Davenport Iowa Area Pretty sure that's the unit you are looking for. Owner has no E mail and I don't think he sees the list. Was on our local 2 meter swap list
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00224.html (8,461 bytes)

3. [TenTec] re: No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: kc4atu@yahoo.com (Bill ROWLETT)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
I would think that the rec. with the 1208 transverter and the Orion will be better than with the 6n2. Wait and try the transverter first. Consentrate on getting the best antenna for 6 in the air. Tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00228.html (8,480 bytes)

4. [TenTec] re: No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:56:46 -0500
While the quoted material above stresses that the finals can deliver 100 watts, 100% duty cycle into ANY SWR, I wonder what the IP3 and IP5 numbers are for 100 watts into nothing more extraordinary
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00231.html (10,705 bytes)

5. [TenTec] re: No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: n4py@qvssoftware.com (N4PY)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:26:29 -0400
George, I don't see anything to tell me that the transmit occupied bandwidth of the Orion will be any larger than other transceivers. Where do you see this? All I see is the transmit bandwidth will b
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00232.html (12,225 bytes)

6. [TenTec] re: No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:39:46 -0500
This is part of the TX spec on N9VV's website: TX bandwidth: 100-3900 Hz in 10-Hz steps. TX frequency response: 100-4000 Hz max -6 dB points. TX equalizer: Up to 6 dB/octave bass/treble boost/cut. TX
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00234.html (10,012 bytes)

7. [TenTec] re: No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:53:13 -0400
Hmmm....I had thought IP (e.g. IP2 - IP3) refered to "Intercept Point" as an intermod measuring basis for receive performance, not the transmitter...or is my assumption incorrect? If so, then how is
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00235.html (11,239 bytes)

8. [TenTec] re: No 6M on the Orion (WTB: Ten-Tec 526 6N2) (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:11:38 -0500
Intermodulation distortion for both transmitters and receivers can be measured by using a two-tone signal, as seen in the usual ARRL Lab reports. I used informal shorthand in referring to the third a
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00236.html (9,632 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu