Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+re\:\s+Receiver\s+comparison\s+chart\s+on\s+website\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] re: Receiver comparison chart on website (score: 1)
Author: EAvila@caiso.com (Avila, Edward)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 09:34:46 -0800
Mark, good points.......big difference between Omni and K2 is price!!! I'm a Ten Tec fan (Corsair II and Scout) but would seriously consider selling off all that for a K2 but the lack of power stops
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00079.html (10,171 bytes)

2. [TenTec] re: Receiver comparison chart on website (score: 1)
Author: jmalloy@hamilton.edu (Joe Malloy)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 12:56:36 -0500
Ed, if the only thing the K2 wants is power, well, you're in for a surprise: they're going to release the integrated 100 watt PA during this quarter of 2001, at least they plan to (it's integrated in
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00080.html (10,029 bytes)

3. [TenTec] re: Receiver comparison chart on website (score: 1)
Author: EAvila@caiso.com (Avila, Edward)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:07:27 -0800
Thanks Joe, I've been waiting for the Elecraft 100-watt amp to appear for a year now.....I agree with you about the Corsair II, I'd probably keep it and "steal" some money from the kid's college fund
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00081.html (10,734 bytes)

4. [TenTec] re: Receiver comparison chart on website (score: 1)
Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 12:38:39 -0800
While the K2 looks attractive in many ways, has anyone built a kit of this complexity lately? And made it work? If I recall, this is a 12 watt TX radio too. Wonder how that would fair in a pile-up on
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00083.html (11,530 bytes)

5. [TenTec] re: Receiver comparison chart on website (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 12:45:11 -0600
At least 1700 hams HAVE built K2 in the last year. Some I've known with little technical kit building practice. The PA module exists, but I guess isn't yet in production. I've seen it. 73, Jerry, K0C
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00084.html (8,370 bytes)

6. [TenTec] re: Receiver comparison chart on website (score: 1)
Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 11:03:13 -0800 (PST)
Elecraft has a 100 watt PA planned for introduction in the next few months. It will be a module that can be stuck into the radio in place of the removable ATU and battery pack. Another solution for t
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00086.html (9,226 bytes)

7. [TenTec] re: Receiver comparison chart on website (score: 1)
Author: jmalloy@hamilton.edu (Joe Malloy)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 14:29:17 -0500
Bob, I built a K2 with all available accessories but the battery (SSB board, NB, 160, antenna tuner) and it probably took me about 60 or 65 hours over a period of two months to do it. I'm 50 years ol
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00088.html (14,133 bytes)

8. [TenTec] re: Receiver comparison chart on website (score: 1)
Author: EAvila@caiso.com (Avila, Edward)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 11:40:32 -0800
Joe, I completely agree....I build kits for the fun and education value not to save money.....and, otherwise I would just be sitting at home in the evening sipping cheapo wine and watching some crap
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00090.html (14,750 bytes)

9. [TenTec] re: Receiver comparison chart on website (score: 1)
Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 19:11:43 -0500
complexity too. Wonder how that monobanders Bob, surely you jest. Maybe you just don't know. Maybe you think QRO is the only way to go. Take a look at the Ten-Tec QRP kits. There's a lot of complexit
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00097.html (9,058 bytes)

10. [TenTec] re: Receiver comparison chart on website (score: 1)
Author: gctotten@juno.com (Gerald C Totten)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 19:19:42 -0500
Or.......Power is no substitute for skill, as we QRP folks like to say. I have cracked many a pileup with a ARGONAUT 509. Jerry K8JRO -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions:
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00098.html (8,115 bytes)

11. [TenTec] re: Receiver comparison chart on website (score: 1)
Author: randas@mindspring.com (Tim Randa)
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 19:37:25 -0500
Nice comments Joe..some guys just have no/little idea how effective one can be at qrp levels. I must admit it's a bit more of a challenge on ssb than cw, but it's not hard to crack the pileups with a
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00099.html (10,621 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu