Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+re\:\s+rig\s+review\s+site\s+\-\s+sorry\s+I\s+brought\s+it\s+up\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+re\:\s+rig\s+review\s+site\s+\-\s+sorry\s+I\s+brought\s+it\s+up\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] re: rig review site - sorry I brought it up (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Hopper" <n9vv@mail.hamsnet.net (Kenneth Hopper); Date: Wed, 15 Sep 99 09:00:06 CST; I have no association with TenTec or with eHAM. I am not pimping for eHAM or any Ham Magazine. I was just trying to alert you guys to the nifty new site where rigs are reviewed. I hoped that the Pega; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00210.html (7,494 bytes)
2. [TenTec] re: rig review site - sorry I brought it up (score: 1): Author: vbbond@ix.netcom.com (vbbond@ix.netcom.com); Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 19:19:33 -0700; Ken: Hey, have no fear! Thanks for introducing me, and I'm sure others as well, to a new ham radio web site. I much appreciate it. I agree with you: more TT wireheads should post reviews concerning T; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00219.html (7,429 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]