Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ten\s+tec\s+net\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ten\s+tec\s+net\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 21:27:51 -0500; My Paragon and my Paragon II both will transmit and receive on that frequency. Of course since the US ham band is 7.0 to 7.3 MHz I dare not try it except on a dummy load. -:) 73 Bob, K4TAX __________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00475.html (8,344 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 11:41:19 -0400; You have to run a "divide by a thousand" transverter :) _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00479.html (8,119 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:07:34 -1000; My Paragons don't go down that low. I wanted to try to listen to SAQ on 17.2 kHz and found that my Paragon II only goes down to 99.9 kHz. When KPH was on the air last week, I used the Paragon II to h; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00487.html (9,788 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:03:26 -0400; Not sure about the Para II but the original Para will have more sensitivity on MF if you remove a jumper (#51?) from logic board to the rf amp. It stops the logic from putting in the attenuator on th; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00495.html (8,549 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:45:29 -1000; Hi Perry, Great Information! Yes I checked out my Paragon II manual, and sure enough there is a control line which causes RX input RF to bypass the first amplifier stage only when in 0.100 - 1.7 MHz.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00513.html (9,630 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:01:45 -0500; The original Paragon has much better performance in the 100 KHz to 500 KHz compared to the Paragon II. Different front ends. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec maili; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00519.html (11,242 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 03:35:05 -0400; Glad to hear that the rigs are similar in this respect. You should notice 12-15 dB improvement in sensitivity as I did. Have fun.... Perry _______________________________________________ TenTec maili; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00523.html (8,495 bytes)
28. [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1): Author: Rob <rhmeyer50@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:30:08 -0700 (PDT); Good Day, My first post here; Yesterday evenings 40M net was on 7182 Khz. at 4:30 PM EDT. 73, Rob WA9UAA ____________________________________________________________________________________ Moody fri; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00416.html (6,554 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]