Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+tentec\s+238B\s+or\s+palstar\s+1500cv\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+tentec\s+238B\s+or\s+palstar\s+1500cv\s+\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ? (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:18:39 -0800; I'm trying to decide which of the above two high power ant tuners (new) is the best one to get. I have a TT Omni 6 (opt 1) and an Ameritron 572 amp with internal QSK. My understanding is the TT amp i; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00503.html (8,249 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ? (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:22:39 -0600; The L network is more efficient by having losses in only two components, an L and C vs. 3 components in the conventional Tee tuner. I think the Ten Tec components are usually pretty rugged. Any rolle; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00504.html (7,665 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ? (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Jednacz" <tjednacz@ieee.org>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:34:59 -0500; Another reason is an L tuner only has one match point. A T tuner can have an apparent match and a real match. In the apparent match condition all the energy is going into the tuner and circulating wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00505.html (7,434 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ? (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:07:37 EST; Jeff I have had both and the Ameritron ATR30. I would rate them in this order: TT, Ameritron then Palstar. The Palstar is a very nicely made unit with better construction than the ATR30. However, if; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00506.html (9,237 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ? (score: 1): Author: Jim Davis <nn6ee@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:20:06 -0800 (PST); Jeff, I've had the 238B tuner for a couple of years now and the only thing I've got negative to say about it is the cheapy METER!!! It was NEVER ACCURATE to begin with and now it does'nt ever work. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00507.html (9,458 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ? (score: 1): Author: "K. Indart" <kitdart@ntelos.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:59:04 -0500; Hi Not familiar with Palstar, but have had a TT 238 for about 3 years without any problem, running max power at times. My antenna is a 135 foot dipole at 55 feet, center fed with home made open line,; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00510.html (9,777 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ? (score: 1): Author: <c-hawley@uiuc.edu>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:33:27 -0600; I'm not sure I would call it an "apparent" match. It's just that a T network is two L networks back to back. You can transform up to some impedance and then down to what you are trying to match. How; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00523.html (10,142 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]