- 1. [TenTec] To The Moderator (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Spencer" <ronspencer@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:28:06 -0400
- How about not listing messages that do not truncate all the attached messages in their response? Its hardly necessary that the full string of the messages be included in a response. It just clutters
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00075.html (6,817 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] to the moderator (score: 1)
- Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 11:00:41 -0400
- Why put the burden on the moderator? It is mostly laziness on the part of posters. I spent about 10 seconds truncating your message above.....it is so simple. Easier than resetting the threshold leve
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00103.html (7,095 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] to the moderator (score: 1)
- Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 11:15:18 -0500
- For those using Outlook Express, here's how it's done: Select TOOLS Select OPTIONS from the pull down menu. Select the SEND tab Then un-check the box "Include message in reply." Select APPLY and then
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00106.html (7,496 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] to the moderator (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 18:24:41 -0700
- From the List Administrator: I do not approve every message that is sent to the list. To do so would be a huge increase in workload for me, and the list members wouldn't like the result, since I get
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00135.html (8,368 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] to the moderator (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 22:17:41 -0000
- Jim. I sent a message about a week ago. Never showed up. Am on on a'bad guy list for something? truncate... of posters. I spent about 10 seconds truncating your message above.....it is so simple. Eas
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00139.html (9,360 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu