Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+v1369\s+and\s+Sweep\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+v1369\s+and\s+Sweep\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] v1369 and Sweep (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:30:27 -0500; Does everyone notice that with v1369, the sweep function stops as you tune the VFO know? Mine does and if your trying to get to a signal on the sweep screen, you have to stop turning the VFO and wait; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00519.html (6,526 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] v1369 and Sweep (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:34:08 EST; Well, This may be a result of not having a standard, regression test list and full formal procedure for testing firmware after many program changes before releasing it. I have seen times when custome; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00520.html (7,497 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] v1369 and Sweep (score: 1): Author: "Larry Rockfield" <w6ub@nxs.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:02:58 -0500; "Does everyone notice that with v1369, the sweep function stops as you tune the VFO know? Mine does and if your trying to get to a signal on the sweep screen, you have to stop turning the VFO and wai; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00522.html (7,643 bytes)
4. [TenTec] v1369 and Sweep (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:30:36 -0500; tune the VFO This is most likely due to the VFO encoder now having higher priority with the CPU to avoid the "digital" tuning sound and delays which 5B4AGN and others complained about previously: htt; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00523.html (8,262 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] v1369 and Sweep (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:03:08 EST; The sweep never was fast enough to keep up with tuning changes even in the previous firmware. I just read the scale, add or subtract from the display frequency and tune to where I expect the signal t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00525.html (7,540 bytes)
6. [TenTec] v1369 and Sweep (score: 1): Author: "John Rader" <k5xtx@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:39:22 -0600; Ever since I recieved my Orion with v1364 the sweep has has slowed or stopped with the use of NR. Now it just runs slow with v1369 all the time. It refreshes about 2 frames per second which is too sl; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00530.html (7,566 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] v1369 and Sweep (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:42:02 EST; Interesting behavior. I just had the NR running and when I turned it off the sweep froze. Turning NR back on got the sweep going again. Turning off the sweep and turning it back on has no effect. Cha; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00535.html (7,850 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] v1369 and Sweep (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:12:37 EST; I think the sweep is very usefull. Right now I am on a DX net on 15 mtrs, occationally I may see a signal a few KC's away. I go to investigate it wth RX # 2. If it's somrthing I need I can just push; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00538.html (7,537 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]