Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Auto\s+tuner\,\s+was\s+Re\:\s+Omni\s+V\s+for\s+QRP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Auto\s+tuner\,\s+was\s+Re\:\s+Omni\s+V\s+for\s+QRP\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (score: 1): Author: c-hawley@uiuc.edu (C. J. Hawley); Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 09:21:04 -0500; Gee, what a great idea. I have never been able to get a good answer about my TT auto tuner. If you turn it off and then change the position of the antenna switch and then turn it on, the roller induc; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00018.html (11,110 bytes)
2. Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (score: 1): Author: kb7et@usa.pipeline.com (Jim Sheffield); Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 17:37:43 GMT; almost seems go nuts. Just HAVE TO put my $ .02-worth in: Ten-Tec has their "finger on the pulse" of what hams REALLY want. First company in a long time (IMO, since R.L. Drake) to truly understand an; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00019.html (7,699 bytes)
3. Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (score: 1): Author: jholly@hposl62.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback); Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 11:06:12 -0700; It won't be the bean counters that put them out of business, it will be their engineering and manufacturing. I pointed out for over a year the need for slower RIT tuning on the OMNI-VI. "Thanks, we'l; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00020.html (9,791 bytes)
4. Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 10:54:49 -0700; Hmmmmm, All of those you reported, with the exception of the "pumping" qsk, my OMNI-6 has no problem with. And - I have always found the engineering dep't to be much more helpful than the U.S. reps o; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00021.html (10,376 bytes)
5. Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (score: 1): Author: jholly@hposl62.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback); Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 12:49:59 -0700; OMNI-VI. <snipped my own stuff> They were there before the new ROM, which I did get a beta copy of and tried. It corrected the problems. I have not experienced the "pumping qsk", nor the howling filt; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00022.html (11,839 bytes)
6. Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (score: 1): Author: c-hawley@uiuc.edu (C. J. Hawley); Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 15:42:31 -0500; This reminds me of something that I've noticed in my conversations with a couple of TT guys over the phone and at Dayton. I had the distinct impression that they did not have first hand knowledge abo; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00026.html (9,516 bytes)
7. Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG); Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 13:29:35 -0700; Hmmm, serious venom aimed at the OMNI VI. One has replied mostly point for point, that's good. I would echo all that, the QSK is not as good as I would like, but other than that, I will own my OMNI V; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00027.html (7,441 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]