Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Centaur\s+411\s+Amp\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Centaur\s+411\s+Amp\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: RD501@aol.com (RD501@aol.com); Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 23:06:04 -0500; Hello. I am the proud owner of a brand new Centaur. It is very VERY nice amp - beautiful QSK on CW! It is a good size and looks nice sitting next to my rig. I've received good signal reports on SSB,; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00103.html (8,039 bytes)
2. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: sales@tentec.com (Ten-Tec Inc.); Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 15:28:32 Eastern Standard Time; Hello from Ten-Tec ! Yes, the wattmeter is out of calibration. If you don't have another wattmeter to calibrate it against, tune it up for max. output on 20 or 40 meters into a dummy load (you should; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00107.html (9,644 bytes)
3. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: c-hawley@uiuc.edu (Chuck (Jack) Hawley); Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 09:20:40 -0600; Two things......seems like it would be good to have a better calibration procedure during production since it didn't get misadjusted by itself. The other thing is the test report in CQ that went into; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00110.html (10,142 bytes)
4. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: n4xy@avana.net (Ed Tanton); Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 12:27:21 -0500; One thing individual owners could do-if TT won't-is to place individual pieces of teflon between the plates. Nye does this in the MB-V tuner (they use polyethelene one or two of which I once burned u; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00112.html (11,698 bytes)
5. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: sales@tentec.com (Ten-Tec Inc.); Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 14:24:28 Eastern Standard Time; Chuck: Agreed. Apologies to the owner of this amplifier for missing this in QC. Absolutely not. A damp or dirty tuning capacitor, under full load, has an excellent chance to arc. The comments about a; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00118.html (9,737 bytes)
6. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: phelbert@rica.net (Paul, Wv3j); Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 19:59:11 -0700; After reading the Article in CQ and observations from other users (and as one who has been well satisfied with Ten Tec's gear and service) I ordered one of the demo Centaur 411 amps. I am now about h; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00133.html (10,388 bytes)
7. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: RD501@aol.com (RD501@aol.com); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 09:37:32 -0500; Hello. Like you, I am also having numerous problems with my Centaur, except, I bought a NEW one. First of all, the Wattmeter was completely out of calibration, or should I say it wasn't calibrated at; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00134.html (9,870 bytes)
8. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: c-hawley@uiuc.edu (Chuck (Jack) Hawley); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 09:29:47 -0600; So not we know that it doesn't have a step start....not unusual though for this price class but too bad anyway. I wonder if the (cheap), in series with the line current, thermister type of current li; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00135.html (13,838 bytes)
9. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: mlmpro@juno.com (Alan l Hagen); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 08:08:44 PST; Hello there, If you want long distance phone service for 9.9 cents a minute 24-hours a day, 7-days a week, all US. NO PRIME TIME. NO CIRCLES. Any body any time..... I've been using this service for o; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00136.html (11,692 bytes)
10. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: sbookout@mnsinc.com (Steve Bookout); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 12:49:05 -0500 (EST); Hello Paul, Steve, NJ4F, here. I have owned a TITAN for several years and am wondering why, if arcing is prevelant, TEN TEC doesn't do what is done with the TITAN, use polypropelene with the caps. In; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00137.html (12,662 bytes)
11. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 14:38:05 -0500; If it's any restitution, the Ameritron AL-80B I had arced between the plates of it's final caps also. I use the Hercules-2 now and love it. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.html Sub; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00138.html (8,333 bytes)
12. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: c-hawley@uiuc.edu (Chuck (Jack) Hawley); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 15:53:50 -0600; Yes. I have a Hercules-2 also and also love it. I hooked mine up to my Yaesu 990 (through an interface ckt that I made) and the 990 switches bands on the Herc. Neat. I must say to TenTec, thanks for; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00139.html (8,682 bytes)
13. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: n4xy@avana.net (Ed Tanton); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 17:56:10 -0500; I'm sorry Chuck... I think concern over a 12 hour drift of well under 100 hz for voice communications is absurd. Flame away. loop the Tec difficult raised. 72/73 Ed Tanton N4XY EMAIL: n4xy@avana.net; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00140.html (15,842 bytes)
14. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: c-hawley@uiuc.edu (Chuck (Jack) Hawley); Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 22:58:17 -0600; No flames. You're right. I just happened to want 3 hertz. By the way, the tuner is not for sale. It works great for the most part, better than anything on the market...just needs a little finagling.; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00141.html (10,097 bytes)
15. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: DUANEC@prodigy.net (DUANEC); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 00:22:21 -0600; I also have a new Centaur (again, the "CQ" review - amazing the power of these articles, huh?!). Since I don't have antennas up that will take the power yet and no dummy load, I've only had it on the; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00142.html (10,615 bytes)
16. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: JDuffy@aol.com (JDuffy@aol.com); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 09:50:09 -0500; I have an Ameritron 811A amp that also has three 811 tubes in it like the Centaur amp. Typical output is about 400 watts. I know both manufacturers say 600 out, but I think that is when you are drivi; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00144.html (8,288 bytes)
17. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: sales@tentec.com (Ten-Tec Inc.); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 13:49:24 Eastern Standard Time; Good morning: Most discussion on the reflector takes place on the weekend, so it was interesting to see how this thread developed in the meantime, as I didn't read any of this until getting to work o; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00145.html (11,340 bytes)
18. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: RD501@aol.com (RD501@aol.com); Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 16:43:04 -0500; Thanks for the input about 400 watts being fairly normal for these amps. I wonder if they mean 600 watts P.E.P., in the sense that RMS output is .707 times the P.E.P. output? That would put it around; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00146.html (7,816 bytes)
19. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com); Date: Tue, 24 Dec 1996 01:31:25 -0500; Scott, Well stated. I believe that TenTec has been very upfront over the years in articulating problems and concerns regarding their radios. I, for one, have been a satisfied customer, and have found; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00149.html (7,986 bytes)
20. Centaur 411 Amp (score: 1): Author: KC0EI@aol.com (KC0EI@aol.com); Date: Tue, 24 Dec 1996 07:31:39 -0500; << Scott, Well stated. I believe that TenTec has been very upfront over the years in articulating problems and concerns regarding their radios. I, for one, have been a satisfied customer, and have fo; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00150.html (8,254 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]